Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39198870›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2024

RaTexT®: a novel rapid tick exposure test for detecting acaricide resistance in Rhipicephalus microplus ticks in Brazil.

Frans Jongejan, Laura Berger, José Reck, Priscila Teixeira Ferreira, Mariana Silveira de Jesus, Fabio Barbour Scott, Barbara Rauta de Avelar, Brena Gava Guimarães, Thais Ribeiro Correia, Dennis Muhanguzi and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Frans JongejanDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X04, Onderstepoort, 0110, Republic of South Africa. Frans.Jongejan@up.ac.za.
Laura BergerTBD International BV, BioScience Center, Wageningen University Research, Runderweg 6, 8219 PK, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
José ReckInstituto de Pesquisas Veterinárias Desidério Finamor, Estrada do Conde, 6000, Eldorado do Sul, RS, 92990-000, Brazil.
Priscila Teixeira FerreiraInstituto de Pesquisas Veterinárias Desidério Finamor, Estrada do Conde, 6000, Eldorado do Sul, RS, 92990-000, Brazil.
Mariana Silveira de JesusInstituto de Pesquisas Veterinárias Desidério Finamor, Estrada do Conde, 6000, Eldorado do Sul, RS, 92990-000, Brazil.
Fabio Barbour ScottInstituto de Veterinária da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, BR-465, Brazil.
Barbara Rauta de AvelarInstituto de Veterinária da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, BR-465, Brazil.
Brena Gava GuimarãesInstituto de Veterinária da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, BR-465, Brazil.
Thais Ribeiro CorreiaInstituto de Veterinária da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, BR-465, Brazil.
Dennis MuhanguziCollege of Veterinary Medicine Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Patrick VudrikoCollege of Veterinary Medicine Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Joseph ByaruhangaCollege of Veterinary Medicine Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Maria TumwebazeCollege of Veterinary Medicine Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Yakob NagagiTanzania Plant Health and Pesticides Authority (TPHPA), P.O. Box 3024, Arusha, Tanzania.
Violet TembaTanzania Plant Health and Pesticides Authority (TPHPA), P.O. Box 3024, Arusha, Tanzania.
Abel S BiguezotonCentre International de Recherche-Développement sur l'élevage en zone Subhumide (CIRDES) Bobo-Dioulasso, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Souaïbou FarougouEcole Polytechnique d'Abomey-Calavi, Université Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Republic of Benin.
Safiou AdehanEcole Polytechnique d'Abomey-Calavi, Université Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Republic of Benin.
Humphrey JumbaInternational Livestock Research Institute, P.O.Box 30709, Nairobi, 00100, Kenya.
Laura HommingaTBD International BV, BioScience Center, Wageningen University Research, Runderweg 6, 8219 PK, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Iris HulsebosTBD International BV, BioScience Center, Wageningen University Research, Runderweg 6, 8219 PK, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Alita PetersenTBD International BV, BioScience Center, Wageningen University Research, Runderweg 6, 8219 PK, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Guilherme KlafkeInstituto de Pesquisas Veterinárias Desidério Finamor, Estrada do Conde, 6000, Eldorado do Sul, RS, 92990-000, Brazil. guilherme-klafke@agricultura.rs.gov.br.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcaricide resistance in cattle ticks is a significant concern in (sub)tropical regions, particularly Brazil. The Larval Packet Test (LPT) is the standard laboratory bioassay for resistance diagnosis, which requires triplicates of seven acaricidal dilutions plus controls to cover larval mortalities ranging between 0 and 100%. The value of the LPT lies in providing resistance ratios based on the ratio between the LC50 calculated with potentially resistant and susceptible ticks. However, LC50 ratios are difficult to translate into practical advice for farmers. Moreover, LPT requires laboratory facilities to maintain susceptible tick colonies, and it takes 6 weeks to obtain the larvae to be tested by LPT derived from engorged female ticks collected from cattle in the field. Our novel approach was twofold: first, we upgraded the LPT to the Resistance Intensity Test (RIT) by adopting the latest WHO guidelines for resistance detection in mosquitoes, which combines a 1 × recommended dose with 5 × and 10 × concentrated doses to reveal low, moderate and high resistance intensity, respectively. This reduced the number of test papers and tick larvae and, more importantly, provided relevant information on the resistance level. Our second innovative step was to abolish testing larvae entirely and expose partly engorged adult ticks to the same acaricidal doses immediately after removing them from cattle in the field. This resulted in the Rapid Tick exposure Test (RaTexT®), wherein partly engorged adult ticks were exposed to an acaricide-impregnated, specially designed matrix providing test results within 24 h. This approach directly compared resistance detection in tick larvae in the RIT with resistance in adult ticks in RaTexT®.

methodsLaboratory validation was conducted in Brazil with resistant and susceptible colonies of Rhipicephalus microplus ticks. For field validation, adult R. microplus ticks collected from different cattle farms in Brazil were evaluated for resistance to RaTexT®, and the results regarding their larval progenies were compared with those for the RIT. Partly engorged adult ticks derived from cattle infested with laboratory and field strains of R. microplus were exposed to deltamethrin in RaTexT® containers, which contained six rows of four interconnected compartments, accommodating five to eight semi-engorged female ticks with a preferred size ranging between 5 and 8 mm. The corresponding larvae of each strain were exposed in the RIT to the same deltamethrin concentrations in filter papers.

resultsIn RaTexT®, mortality in adult ticks from a resistant strain of R. microplus from Seropédica in Brazil was 38.4%, 54.2% and 75.0% at the 1 ×, 5 × and 10 × doses of deltamethrin, respectively. In RIT, mortality of larvae from the same resistant strain was 2.0%, 4.9% and 19.5% at 1 ×, 5 × and 10 × doses, respectively. The results of RaTexT® and RIT agreed since both tests identified a high level of resistance based on a cut-off of 90% mortality. In RaTexT®, mortality of adult ticks from a susceptible strain originating from Porto Alegre was 73.8%, 92.9% and 97.6% at the 1 ×, 5 × and 10 × doses, respectively. In RIT, mortality of larvae from the susceptible strain was 95.2%, 95.2% and 96.8% at the 1 ×, 5 × and 10 × doses, respectively. Interestingly, both tests identified a low number of unexpected resistant individuals in the susceptible strain since the mortality of neither larvae nor adults reached 100%. This effect remained unnoticed in the LPT, wherein a resistance ratio of 159.5 was found based on the LC50 of the resistant strain divided by the LC50 of the susceptible strain. Next, RaTexT® was compared with RIT using adult and larval ticks derived from three field strains of R. microplus in Brazil. RaTexT® detected high levels of resistance to deltamethrin in adult ticks in all strains, which was confirmed in larvae tested by the RIT. Both tests agreed on the same resistance level with significantly lower mortality rates in larvae than in adult ticks.

conclusionsRaTexT® is a novel rapid pen-site test for detecting acaricide resistance in adult livestock ticks. It potentially replaces laborious tests using larval ticks and provides results within 24 h relevant to acaricide resistance management of livestock ticks.

Indexed as

AcaricidesLarvaRhipicephalusTick InfestationsAnimalsBiological AssayBrazilCattleCattle DiseasesDrug ResistanceFemaleNitrilesPyrethrinsAcaricidesdecamethrinNitrilesPyrethrinsAcaricide resistanceCattle ticksLarval Packet TestRapid Tick exposure TestResistance Intensity TestRhipicephalus microplus

Identifiers

PMID39198870
PMCPMC11360494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.