ArticleBMC health services research2024
A mixed methods study of early childhood providers' perceptions of the acceptability and feasibility of parenting for lifelong Health tip sheets in Ontario, Canada.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUniversal parenting campaigns are efficient, cost-effective and can eliminate barriers to accessing conventional, face-to-face parenting interventions. The aims of the CHAMPP4KIDS study were to assess Canadian early childhood providers' perceptions of the acceptability and feasibility of implementing a universal parenting resource, the Parenting for Lifelong Health tip sheets.
methodsUsing a convergent mixed method design, an online survey of providers working with families with young children in Ontario, Canada was followed by focus group discussions with a subset of providers to explore their perceptions of using the tip sheets in their professional practice.
resultsProviders generally perceived the tip sheets to be acceptable but had reservations with respect to the feasibility of distributing the sheets to their clients as standalone, universal parenting resources. Providers agreed the tip sheets covered topics pertinent to caregivers' concerns, offered useful strategies and, therefore, had the potential to be valuable, engaging resources for families. However, many providers said the sheets would only be effective as complementary resources to facilitated in-person sessions, especially for high-needs families.
conclusionProviders suggested that future iterations of these resources take into consideration more accessible design and formatting, literacy levels, word choice and further cultural adaptation. Insight into the nuances and potential divergence between provider perceptions of universal materials' acceptability and feasibility can help adapt materials to pre-emptively respond to potential implementation barriers, facilitate intervention fidelity and, ultimately, increase the likelihood of intervention acceptability and feasibility of both providers and caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.