Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39198859›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2024

Elevated expression of Aurora-A/AURKA in breast cancer associates with younger age and aggressive features.

L M Ingebriktsen, R O C Humlevik, A A Svanøe, A K M Sæle, I Winge, K Toska, M B Kalvenes, B Davidsen, A Heie, G Knutsvik and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

L M IngebriktsenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Section for Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
R O C HumlevikDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Section for Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
A A SvanøeDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Section for Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
A K M SæleDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Section for Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
I WingeDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Section for Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
K ToskaSection for Cancer Genomics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
M B KalvenesDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Section for Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
B DavidsenDepartment of Surgery, Section for Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
A HeieDepartment of Surgery, Section for Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
G KnutsvikDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Section for Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
C AskelandDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Section for Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
I M StefanssonDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Section for Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
E A Hoivik *Department of Clinical Medicine, Section for Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
L A Akslen *Department of Clinical Medicine, Section for Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
E WikDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Section for Pathology, Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. Elisabeth.wik@uib.no.

Funding

Helse Vest Research Fund F-12143University of Bergen, Research Council of Norway, Center of Excellence funding scheme 223250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveAurora kinase A (AURKA) is reported to be overexpressed in breast cancer. In addition to its role in regulating cell cycle and mitosis, studies have reported AURKA involvements in oncogenic signaling in suppressing BRCA1 and BRCA2. We aimed to characterize AURKA protein and mRNA expression in a breast cancer cohort of the young, investigating its relation to clinico-pathologic features and survival, and exploring age-related AURKA-associated biological processes.

methodsAurora kinase A immunohistochemical staining was performed on tissue microarrays of primary tumors from an in-house breast cancer cohort (n = 355) with information on clinico-pathologic data, molecular markers, and long and complete follow-up. A subset of the in-house cohort (n = 127) was studied by the NanoString Breast Cancer 360 expression panel for exploration of mRNA expression. METABRIC cohorts < 50 years at breast cancer diagnosis (n = 368) were investigated for differentially expressed genes and enriched gene sets in AURKA mRNA high tumors stratified by age. Differentially expressed genes and gene sets were investigated using network analyses and g:Profiler.

resultsHigh Aurora kinase A protein expression associated with aggressive clinico-pathologic features, a basal-like subtype, and high risk of recurrence score. These patterns were confirmed using mRNA data. High AURKA gene expression demonstrated independent prognostic value when adjusted for traditional clinico-pathologic features and molecular subtypes. Notably, high AURKA expression significantly associated with reduced disease-specific survival within patients below 50 years, also within the luminal A subtype. Tumors of high AURKA expression showed gene expression patterns reflecting increased DNA damage activation and higher BRCAness score.

conclusionsOur findings indicate higher AURKA expression in young breast cancer, and associations between high Aurora-A/AURKA and aggressive tumor features, including higher tumor cell proliferation, and shorter survival, in the young. Our findings point to AURKA as a marker for increased DNA damage and DNA repair deficiency and suggest AURKA as a biomarker of clinical relevance in young breast cancer.

Indexed as

Aurora Kinase ABiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsAdultAge FactorsFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisAURKA protein, humanAurora Kinase ABiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID39198859
PMCPMC11360479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.