ArticleBMC ophthalmology2024
Potential dynamic corneal response parameters for myopia: relationships between axial length with whole eye movement at the first and second applanations and the highest concavity.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relationship Between Scheimpflug-Based Ocular Biomechanics and Myopic Maculopathy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Changes in Ocular Biomechanics During Adolescence and Its Relationship with Lifestyle and Myopic Progression: The Oporto Myopia Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the correlation between whole eye movement (WEM) parameters measured using Corvis ST and axial length (AL) to explore whether AL affects WEMs.
methodsThis single-center, cross-sectional study included data from healthy subjects and patients preparing for refractive surgery at the Qingdao Eye Hospital of Shandong First Medical University. Data were collected from July 2021 to April 2022. We first determined the correlations of WEMs at the time of corneal first applanation (A1_WEM), highest concavity (HC_WEM), and second applanation (A2_WEM), as well as the maximum value of WEM (WEM_Max) with AL. Subsequently, we established a series of regression models to analyze the relationships between different WEM values and AL.
resultsAL was negatively correlated with HC_WEM, A2_WEM, and WEM_Max (r = - 0.28, - 0.23, and - 0.22, respectively; P < 0.001). The correlation between AL and A1_WEM was not significant (P = 0.77). According to the adjusted regression models, AL was negatively associated with HC_WEM (Model 2: β = -7.39, P < 0.001) and WEM_Max (Model 4: β = -3.52, P = 0.02), while the associations of AL with A1_WEM (Model 1: P = 0.61) and A2_WEM (Model 3: P = 0.23) were not significant.
conclusionsAL is an independent negative influencing factor for HC_WEM. WEM is a potentially useful parameter that reflects the biomechanical properties of the eye behind the cornea in myopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.