Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39198777›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2024

Differential effects of everyday-life social support on chronic pain.

Martin Weiß, Annalena Jachnik, Emilia C Lampe, Marthe Gründahl, Michael Harnik, Claudia Sommer, Heike L Rittner, Grit Hein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Psychoneuroendocrine Associations with Momentary Pelvic Pain in Endometriosis.International journal of behavioral medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martin WeißCenter of Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic and Psychotherapy, Translational Social Neuroscience Unit, University Hospital Würzburg, Margarete-Höppel-Platz 1, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. Weiss_M11@ukw.de.
Annalena JachnikCenter of Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic and Psychotherapy, Translational Social Neuroscience Unit, University Hospital Würzburg, Margarete-Höppel-Platz 1, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Emilia C LampeCenter of Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic and Psychotherapy, Translational Social Neuroscience Unit, University Hospital Würzburg, Margarete-Höppel-Platz 1, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Marthe GründahlCenter of Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic and Psychotherapy, Translational Social Neuroscience Unit, University Hospital Würzburg, Margarete-Höppel-Platz 1, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Michael HarnikDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, Centre for Interdisciplinary Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Claudia SommerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Heike L RittnerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, Centre for Interdisciplinary Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Grit HeinCenter of Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic and Psychotherapy, Translational Social Neuroscience Unit, University Hospital Würzburg, Margarete-Höppel-Platz 1, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial support is a multidimensional construct encompassing emotional support as well as pain-focused care and attention, also known as solicitous support. One the one hand, social support is widely believed to positively influence pain symptoms, their intensity, and the ability to cope and influence pain. On the other hand, social support can be negative if it conflicts with the patient's needs or even causes discomfort. How different types of social support influence pain is not very well understood especially because most of the present research originates from laboratory studies, raising uncertainties about its generalizability to the everyday life of individuals with chronic pain.

methodsHere, we tested the effects of emotional, solicitous, and negative social support on pain intensity cross-sectionally in everyday life. We collected data from 20 patients with acute complex regional pain syndrome using a smartphone-based Ecological Momentary Assessment with up to 30 survey prompts over a period of five consecutive days.

resultsOur results showed that solicitous social support decreased pain, in particular in male patients. Emotional support was beneficial on pain in women but not in men.

conclusionsTaken together, these findings highlight the differential effects of social support in every-day life on chronic pain.

Indexed as

Chronic PainSocial SupportAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementComplex regional pain syndromeEcological momentary assessmentPainSocial support

Identifiers

PMID39198777
PMCPMC11351827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.