Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39198772›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2024

Nursing student's perceptions, satisfaction, and knowledge toward utilizing immersive virtual reality application in human anatomy course: quasi-experimental.

Samar Thabet Jallad, Israa Natsheh, Lareen Abu Helo, Dania Mahmoud Ibdah, Amna Salah, Rasha Muhsen, Younes Shehadeh, Naeem Froukh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Virtual Reality Technology in Otolaryngology Patient Care Management: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Future Prospects.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Samar Thabet JalladDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Professions, Al- Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine. sammar1986@live.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1781-978X
Israa NatshehDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Professions, Al- Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.
Lareen Abu HeloDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Professions, Al- Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.
Dania Mahmoud IbdahDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Professions, Al- Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.
Amna SalahDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Professions, Al- Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.
Rasha MuhsenDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Professions, Al- Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.
Younes ShehadehDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Professions, Al- Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.
Naeem FroukhDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Professions, Al- Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA paradigm shift in nursing education is required to prepare Z generation of nursing students through integrated innovative technologies as teaching strategies such as immersive virtual reality in several bioscience and main courses to facilitate and enhance learning process. AIM/

objectiveExamine the effect of utilizing an immersive virtual reality application on students' perceptions, knowledge, and satisfaction in an anatomy course.

methodsA quasi-experimental (pre-post test, one group) design was conducted among 1st year nursing students (N = 138) enrolled in an anatomy course in the spring semester of 2023-2024 in the nursing program in the health professions faculty at Al-Quds University. The technology acceptance model (TAM) was used for data collection.

resultsThe results showed that 96% of participants were satisfied with using the VR application, and it retains their knowledge in the human anatomy course. 92% of the total, were under the age of twenty, and 84% were females. 80.1% (2.99 ± 0.58) of those students had more positive perspectives of VR applications in the nursing courses. Additionally, there were significant differences in students' satisfaction and knowledge toward using VR applications after the anatomy lecture (p = 0.029, p = 0.05, respectively).

conclusionVirtual reality is a supplemental innovative tool for promoting learning. Nursing students perceive immersive virtual reality technologies positively and prefer using three-dimensional images in their anatomy courses, which helps them recall their knowledge, understand concepts of educational content, identify learning objectives, and improve learning outcomes. This study found that virtual reality can improve nursing students' understanding, satisfaction, and knowledge of anatomy.

Indexed as

Anatomy educationImmersive virtual realityNursing educationVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID39198772
PMCPMC11361164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.