Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39198751›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

How does online postal self-sampling (OPSS) shape access to testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs)? A qualitative study of service users.

Tommer Spence, Alison Howarth, David Reid, Jessica Sheringham, Vanessa Apea, David Crundwell, Sara Day, Claire Dewsnap, Louise Jackson, Catherine H Mercer and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. General practice chlamydia testing: a qualitative study of staff approaches using behavioural change theory.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Tommer SpenceInstitute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK. tommer.spence@ucl.ac.uk.
Alison HowarthInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
David ReidInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Jessica SheringhamInstitute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK.
Vanessa ApeaBarts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
David CrundwellLay representative, London, UK.
Sara DayChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Claire DewsnapSheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK.
Louise JacksonInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Catherine H MercerInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Hamish MohammedSTIs and HIV Division, Blood Safety, Health Security Agency, Hepatitis, London, UK.
Jonathan D C RossUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Ann SullivanChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Andy WilliamsBarts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Andrew WinterNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Geoff WongNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Fiona Burns *Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Jo Gibbs *Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR129157
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSexually transmitted infections (STIs) are a serious public health issue in many countries. Online postal self-sampling (OPSS) is increasingly used to test for STIs, a trend accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic. There remains limited understanding of how service users experience OPSS and what leads them to access it over clinic-based services, or vice versa. This research seeks to address these gaps, by undertaking a large qualitative study which sits within the ASSIST study, a mixed-methods, realist evaluation of OPSS.

methodsParticipants were recruited via clinic-based and online sexual health services in three case study areas in England. Purposive sampling was used to over-represent populations disproportionately affected by poor sexual health: young people; people of colour; men who have sex with men; and trans and non-binary people. Semi-structured interviews were analysed using Levesque's conceptual framework of access to healthcare.

resultsWe interviewed 100 service users. Participants typically became aware of OPSS from sexual health services, the internet or word of mouth. Acceptability of OPSS was facilitated by the perceived privacy it offered over clinic-based services, which some participants found embarrassing to access. OPSS also enabled participants to overcome barriers to reaching clinic-based services, such as a lack of appointment availability, although difficulty obtaining OPSS kits in some areas undermined this. As all services in our case study areas were free to use, affordability did not significantly shape access, although OPSS enabled some participants to avoid costs associated with travelling to clinic-based services. Participants were usually able to engage with OPSS, finding it easy to use and reliable, although blood self-sampling was challenging for most. Participants valued the support offered by clinic-based services beyond STI testing, including the opportunity to access contraception or ask staff questions, and felt this was more appropriate when they had specific concerns about their sexual health, such as STI symptoms.

conclusionsOur findings constitute one of the largest qualitative studies to have explored OPSS and offer valuable insights to providers. OPSS shapes access to STI testing in a number of ways, including facilitating access in many circumstances, but users also want to retain access to clinic-based services, particularly for when they believe they need support beyond STI testing.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health Services AccessibilityPostal ServiceQualitative ResearchSexually Transmitted DiseasesAdolescentAdultEnglandFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareSpecimen HandlingYoung AdultAccessDigital healthQualitativeSexual healthTesting

Identifiers

PMID39198751
PMCPMC11360737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.