ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
Optimized deep CNN for detection and classification of diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- OcuViT: A Vision Transformer-Based Approach for Automated Diabetic Retinopathy and AMD Classification.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- An enhanced diabetic retinopathy detection approach using optimized deep learning technique.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in fundus photography for type 2 diabetes: a scoping review of systemic biomarkers and multi-organ risk prediction.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Integrating non-linear radon transformation for diabetic retinopathy grading.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multi-Modal AI for Multi-Label Retinal Disease Prediction Using OCT and Fundus Images: A Hybrid Approach.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy detection using Rosmarus Quagga optimized explainable generative meta learning based deep convolutional neural network model.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Diabetic retinopathy detection based on mobile maxout network and weber local descriptor feature selection using retinal fundus image.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The application of artificial intelligence-generated content in ophthalmology education.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) and Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) are vision related complications prominently found in diabetic patients. The early identification of DR/DME grades facilitates the devising of an appropriate treatment plan, which ultimately prevents the probability of visual impairment in more than 90% of diabetic patients. Thereby, an automatic DR/DME grade detection approach is proposed in this work by utilizing image processing. In this work, the retinal fundus image provided as input is pre-processed using Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) with the aim of enhancing its visual quality. The precise detection of DR/DME is supported further with the application of suitable Artificial Neural Network (ANN) based segmentation technique. The segmented images are subsequently subjected to feature extraction using Adaptive Gabor Filter (AGF) and the feature selection using Random Forest (RF) technique. The former has excellent retinal vein recognition capability, while the latter has exceptional generalization capability. The RF approach also assists with the improvement of classification accuracy of Deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) classifier. Moreover, Chicken Swarm Algorithm (CSA) is used for further enhancing the classifier performance by optimizing the weights of both convolution and fully connected layer. The entire approach is validated for its accuracy in determination of grades of DR/DME using MATLAB software. The proposed DR/DME grade detection approach displays an excellent accuracy of 97.91%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.