ArticleEye (London, England)2024
A retrospective review of selective laser trabeculoplasty outcomes at Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, UK.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response to: 'Comment on: 'Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) outcomes following topical therapy''.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) outcomes following topical therapy.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- The safety and effectiveness of optometrist-delivered selective laser trabeculoplasty.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSelective laser trabeculoplasty has been carried out at Lancashire Teaching Hospitals over the past seven years. This work aimed to review the use of SLT in this Trust. The primary objectives were to establish the efficacy of SLT in reducing intraocular pressure, to analyse how prior treatment with different topical medications can influence SLT outcomes and to analyse the outcomes in revisionary patients.
methodWe conducted a retrospective review of 288 eyes, with a known history of glaucoma or ocular hypertension and who underwent initial SLT laser treatment between October 2018 and January 2020. SLT was performed on known glaucoma and treatment naïve patients where IOP control was deemed sub-optimal. All patient data was fully anonymised.
resultsWe found that SLT was effective in lowering IOP. Around two-thirds of the eyes (181/280, 65%) achieved a reduction in IOP of 10% or more. Just under half (127/280, 45%) achieved a reduction of 20% or more. For a pre-SLT IOP of 14.6 mmHg, we found that no mean change in IOP is expected, and for each 1 mmHg by which the pre-SLT IOP exceeds this threshold, the mean reduction in IOP is expected to be 0.61 mmHg. We also found that combination therapies of PGA plus aqueous suppressants gave better outcomes compared with PGA alone. We found that revisionary SLT compared favourably with the first treatment, although first-time outcomes were not a good predictor of success with revisionary SLT.
conclusionPrimary and revisionary SLT has been shown to be effective across the cohort of patients in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.