Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39198681›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

The advantage of afforestation using native tree species to enhance soil quality in degraded forest ecosystems.

Jialong Qian, Cuiying Ji, Jinyu Yang, Haoran Zhao, Yiwen Wang, Lihua Fu, Qiang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jialong QianCollege of Forestry, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, 071000, China.
Cuiying JiCollege of Forestry, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, 071000, China.
Jinyu YangCollege of Forestry, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, 071000, China.
Haoran ZhaoCollege of Forestry, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, 071000, China.
Yiwen WangCollege of Forestry, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, 071000, China.
Lihua FuHebei Saihanba Mechanized Forest Farm, Chengde, 067000, China.
Qiang LiuCollege of Forestry, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, 071000, China. qiangliu2015@126.com.

Funding

Hebei Provincial Key Research Projects 22326807DNatural Science Foundation of China 32201556Research and demonstration on key technology of close-to-nature management of Larix principis-rupprechtii plantation 2303087State Key Research and Development Program 2023YFD2200803Talent Special Scientific Research Fund of Hebei Agricultural University YJ201942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different vegetation restoration methods have improved soil quality to varying degrees. This study, focused on the forest-grassland-desert transition zone in the Hebei-Inner Mongolia border region, and employed a systematic grid sampling method to establish fixed monitoring plots in the Saihanba Mechanized Forest Farm and the Ulan Buh Grassland. The differences in soil quality evolution across various vegetation restoration methods under the same climatic and soil historical conditions were analyzed, elucidating the roles of these vegetation restoration methods in degraded forest ecosystems, with the aim of providing a reference for ecological restoration under similar land conditions. This study used a grid method to establish sample points in the forest-grassland-desert transitional zone and assessed five methods of vegetation restoration sites: artificial forest composed of native species of Larix principis-rupprechtii (FL), artificial forest composed of exotic Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica (FP), natural secondary broad-leaved forest (FN), open grassland (GO), and enclosed grassland (GC). The differences in soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), total potassium (TK), alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen (AN), rapidly available phosphorus (AP) and rapidly available potassium (AK) among the different vegetation restoration sites were compared via variance analysis, and the soil quality index (SQI) was calculated to assess the soil quality at the sample points. The SOC, TN, and AN contents of forest soil were significantly greater than those of grassland, and the TN, TP, AN, AK, and SOC contents of FL, FN, and GC were significantly greater than those of FP and GO. Among them, the TN, TP, and SOC contents were the highest in the FL, reaching 2.74, 0.39, and 47.27 g kg

Indexed as

ForestsSoilTreesCarbonChinaConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemGrasslandNitrogenPhosphorusCarbonNitrogenPhosphorusSoilDegraded forest ecosystemNative tree speciesSoil nutrientsSoil quality indexVegetation restoration

Identifiers

PMID39198681
PMCPMC11358285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.