ArticleScientific reports2024
Prediction of treatment outcome for branch retinal vein occlusion using convolutional neural network-based retinal fluorescein angiography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpretability of multimodal neural networks for prediction of visual acuity in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integration of peripheral blood-based systemic inflammatory indices and retinal imaging using interpretable machine learning for predicting anti-VEGF treatment response in macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Spine Research: A New Frontier.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning techniques were used in ophthalmology to develop artificial intelligence (AI) models for predicting the short-term effectiveness of anti-VEGF therapy in patients with macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO-ME). 180 BRVO-ME patients underwent pre-treatment FFA scans. After 3 months of ranibizumab injections, CMT measurements were taken at baseline and 1-month intervals. Patients were categorized into good and poor prognosis groups based on macular edema at the 4th month follow-up. FFA-Net, a VGG-based classification network, was trained using FFA images from both groups. Class activation heat maps highlighted important locations. Benchmark models (DesNet-201, MobileNet-V3, ResNet-152, MansNet-75) were compared for training results. Performance metrics included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and ROC curves. FFA-Net predicted BRVO-ME treatment effect with an accuracy of 88.63% and an F1 score of 0.89, with a sensitivity and specificity of 79.40% and 71.34%, respectively.The AUC of the ROC curve for the FFA-Net model was 0.71. The use of FFA based on deep learning technology has feasibility in predicting the treatment effect of BRVO-ME. The FFA-Net model constructed with the VGG model as the main body has good results in predicting the treatment effect of BRVO-ME. The typing of BRVO in FFA may be an important factor affecting the prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.