Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39198595›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Cell spheroid viscoelasticity is deformation-dependent.

Ruben C Boot, Anouk van der Net, Christos Gogou, Pranav Mehta, Dimphna H Meijer, Gijsje H Koenderink, Pouyan E Boukany

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. TheMaterials today. Bio · 2026
    Review
  4. Metabolic starvation-induced cell swelling drives solid stress in tumors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ruben C BootDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2629, HZ, The Netherlands.
Anouk van der NetDepartment of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2629, HZ, The Netherlands.
Christos GogouDepartment of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2629, HZ, The Netherlands.
Pranav MehtaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2629, HZ, The Netherlands.
Dimphna H MeijerDepartment of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2629, HZ, The Netherlands.
Gijsje H KoenderinkDepartment of Bionanoscience, Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2629, HZ, The Netherlands.
Pouyan E BoukanyDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, 2629, HZ, The Netherlands. p.e.boukany@tudelft.nl.

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 819424NWO OCENW.GROOT.20t9.O22NWO VICI Grant VI.C.182.004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue surface tension influences cell sorting and tissue fusion. Earlier mechanical studies suggest that multicellular spheroids actively reinforce their surface tension with applied force. Here we study this open question through high-throughput microfluidic micropipette aspiration measurements on cell spheroids to identify the role of force duration and spheroid deformability. In particular, we aspirate spheroid protrusions of mice fibroblast NIH3T3 and human embryonic HEK293T homogeneous cell spheroids into micron-sized capillaries for different pressures and monitor their viscoelastic creep behavior. We find that larger spheroid deformations lead to faster cellular retraction once the pressure is released, regardless of the applied force. Additionally, less deformable NIH3T3 cell spheroids with an increased expression level of alpha-smooth muscle actin, a cytoskeletal protein upregulating cellular contractility, also demonstrate slower cellular retraction after pressure release for smaller spheroid deformations. Moreover, HEK293T cell spheroids only display cellular retraction at larger pressures with larger spheroid deformations, despite an additional increase in viscosity at these larger pressures. These new insights demonstrate that spheroid viscoelasticity is deformation-dependent and challenge whether surface tension truly reinforces at larger aspiration pressures.

Indexed as

ElasticitySpheroids, CellularAnimalsHEK293 CellsHumansMiceNIH 3T3 CellsSurface TensionViscosity

Identifiers

PMID39198595
PMCPMC11358509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.