Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39198558›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Customized digestion protocols for copepods, euphausiids, chaetognaths and fish larvae facilitate the isolation of ingested microplastics.

Imke Podbielski, Thea Hamm, Mark Lenz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Imke PodbielskiGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany. ipodbielski@geomar.de.
Thea HammGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Mark LenzGEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

JPI Oceans project HOTMIC ("Horizontal and vertical oceanic distribution, transport and impact of microplastics") through national funding by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 03F0851A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Degradation of oceanic plastic waste leads to the formation of microplastics that are ingested by a wide range of animals. Yet, the amounts that are taken up, especially by small zooplankton, are largely unknown. This is mostly due to the complex methodology that is required for isolating ingested microplastics from organisms. We developed customised, effective and benign digestion protocols for four important zooplankton taxa (copepods, euphausiids, chaetognaths and fish larvae), and assessed their digestion efficacy and their potential to cause particle loss or to alter microplastics using six polymers (HDPE, LDPE, PS, PET, PVC, PMMA). All protocols are based on an incubation of the organic matrix with 10% KOH at 38 °C, which is optionally combined with digestive enzymes (chitinase, proteinase K). This yielded digestion efficacies of > 98.2%, recovery rates of > 91.8%, < 2.4% change in microplastics' size, while no visual alteration of the microplastics and no changes in their spectra were observed when analysing them with a hyperspectral imaging camera. The proposed protocols are inexpensive (< 2.15 € per sample), but require several days when enzymatic digestion is included. They will facilitate research on microplastic ingestion by small marine organisms and thus enable well-founded conclusions about the threat that microplastics pose to these animals as well as about the role of biota in determining the vertical distribution of microplastics in oceanic environments.

Indexed as

CopepodaFishesLarvaMicroplasticsAnimalsDigestionWater Pollutants, ChemicalZooplanktonMicroplasticsWater Pollutants, Chemical

Identifiers

PMID39198558
PMCPMC11358325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.