Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39198547›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Genotyping single point mutations in rd1 and rd8 mice using melting curve analysis of qPCR fragments.

Melanie E Schwämmle, Felicitas Bucher, Günther Schlunck, Gottfried Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Melanie E SchwämmleEye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Killianstr. 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Felicitas BucherEye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Killianstr. 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Günther SchlunckEye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Killianstr. 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Gottfried MartinEye Center, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Killianstr. 5, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. gottfried.martin@uniklinik-freiburg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PCR is tolerant to single nucleotide mismatches. Therefore, genotyping of point mutations by PCR requires special conditions for the amplification of allele-specific PCR fragments. MS-PCR (mutagenically separated PCR) is an improved version of ARMS (amplification refractory mutation system) in which additional nucleotide mismatches near the mutation site are used to separate the wt fragments from the mutant fragments in a single-tube PCR. In the originally described procedure, the resulting fragments are resolved on agarose gels according to differences in size introduced by different lengths of the allele-specific primers. In order to evaluate the PCR fragments by melting curve analysis, we enlarged the difference in the melting temperatures of the fragments of the two alleles by increasing the GC content of the longer allele-specific primer resulting in a higher melting temperature of the corresponding fragment. Using the murine retinal degeneration mutations rd1 and rd8 as an example, we show that such primers result in an easy to handle genotyping procedure: qPCR followed by melting curve analysis. In summary, MS-PCR is a simple and easy-to-use method for detecting single nucleotide variants.

Indexed as

Genotyping TechniquesPoint MutationAllelesAnimalsDNA PrimersGenotypeMiceNucleic Acid DenaturationPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRetinal DegenerationTransition TemperatureDNA PrimersARMS PCRGenotypingSingle nucleotide variant

Identifiers

PMID39198547
PMCPMC11358275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.