ArticleScientific reports2024
Characteristics and surgical outcomes of giant retinal tear associated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Giant retinal tear-associated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (GRT-RRD) presents a significant surgical challenge. Trauma stands out as one of the risk factors. This retrospective case series aims to assess the outcomes of GRT-RRD patients treated with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), distinguishing between non-trauma and blunt ocular trauma cases. The medical records and relevant retinal imaging of 60 GRT-RRD patients undergoing PPV and followed with a mean (SD) of 21.2 (13.4) months were reviewed (47 were non-trauma-related and 13 were trauma-related). Both the non-trauma and trauma groups exhibited comparable distribution of proliferative vitreoretinopathy grade (P = 0.067). Following the primary operation, there was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients achieving single surgery anatomical success between the non-trauma group (27/47 patients, 57.5%) and the trauma-related group (9/13 patients, 69.2%) (P = 0.534). At the final follow-up, 17 patients remained tamponade with silicone oil. Among the remaining 43 patients, 33/34 patients (97.1%) in the non-trauma group and 9/9 patients (100%) in the non-trauma group (P = 0.661) achieved comparable final surgical anatomical success. Additionally the final vision was comparable between the two trauma categories (Snellen equivalent of 20/125 for the non-trauma group and 20/200 for the trauma group, P = 0.331). In multivariable regression, no significant factors related to primary reattachment rate or final vision were identified. Non-penetrating ocular trauma did not emerge as a significant risk factor for recurrent detachment post-surgery. This study supports that PPV outcomes in GRT-RRD patients are unaffected by the ocular trauma association and reports the effectiveness of PPV in managing these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.