Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39198492›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2024

Online positive parenting programme for promoting parenting competencies and skills: randomised controlled trial.

Sararat Tuntipuchitanon, Ing-On Kangwanthiti, Ketsupar Jirakran, Pon Trairatvorakul, Weerasak Chonchaiya

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Improving parenting skill through the strong families program in Thailand.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sararat Tuntipuchitanon *Division of Growth and Development, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ing-On Kangwanthiti *Division of Growth and Development, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ketsupar JirakranCenter of Excellence for Maximizing Children's Developmental Potential, Division of Growth and Development, Department of Paediatrics, Sor Kor Building, 11th Floor, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, 1873 Rama IV Road, Pathumwan, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Pon TrairatvorakulDivision of Growth and Development, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. pon.t@chula.md.ORCID 0000-0001-6038-6740
Weerasak ChonchaiyaDivision of Growth and Development, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

Broadcasting and Telecommunications Research and Development Fund for the Public Interest A62-1-(2)-002Grants for the development of new faculty staff, Ratchadaphiseksomphot Fund, Chulalongkorn University DNS 64_050_30_014_1Ratchadaphiseksomphot Fund, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University RA-MF-06/65
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positive parenting programmes (PPP), albeit effective, are not readily accessible to the general public, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. In 103 healthy caregiver-child dyads, we investigated the effectiveness of online PPP on parenting sense of competencies (primary outcome), parenting styles and behavioural concerns of children aged 3-6 years (secondary outcomes) between 2 blinded, parallel groups. After block of 4 randomisations, intervention group (n = 52) attended live, group-based, internet delivered PPP while both intervention and active control group (n = 51) received weekly general education via communication application. Outcomes were measured at baseline, 8 and 14 weeks. Most parents from both groups had high education and household income. From the intervention group, 87.5% of the parents attended live sessions while 8.6% subsequently watched recorded sessions. At 14 weeks, the intervention group reported higher sense of competence (Wald 9.63, p = 0.008); both groups reported using more authoritative parenting style (Wald 15.52, p ≤ 0.001) from Generalised Estimating Equations model. Compared to baseline, both groups had significant reduction of children's emotional problems at 14 weeks (mean change: Intervention = - 0.44, p = 0.033; Control = - 0.30, p = 0.046) and behavioural problems over time (Wald 7.07, p = 0.029). Online PPP offered an easily accessible, primary preventive measure to mitigate behavioural concerns and improve parental competency. Clinical Trial Registration: Thai Clinical Trials Registry ( https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/ ); TCTR20201030001 on 30/10/2020.

Indexed as

COVID-19ParentingAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInternetMaleParent-Child RelationsParents

Identifiers

PMID39198492
PMCPMC11358410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.