ArticleInternational orthopaedics2024
Open segmental tibial bone defects treated with Ilizarov frame: a radiological and functional outcome study with average ten year follow-up.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Treatment of infected tibial nonunion with angular deformity and shortening using the Masquelet technique combined with the Ilizarov technique: A case report.Trauma case reports · 2026Article
- Comparative outcome study of the management of open tibia shaft fractures using Ilizarov frame fixator and linear rail system at University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.International orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSurgical reconstruction of large post-traumatic tibial bone and soft tissue defects following high-energy trauma presents a significant challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. This study aimed to evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes of large post-traumatic tibial bone and soft tissue defects managed by single or double-level bone transport using the Ilizarov technique. MATERIAL &
methods13 patients who underwent treatment for large tibial bone defects (Gustillo IIIa, IIIb, IIIc) along with soft tissue defects with Ilizarov from 2010 to 2020 A.D were included. ASAMI functional and radiological outcomes were assessed at the final follow-up to report the outcome.
resultsThe mean age was 27.38 (18-48). An average bone defect was 7.69 cm (5-13 cm). Based upon the Gustillo-Anderson classification (GA), 2 (15%) of them were GA - 3 A, 7 (54%) were GA - 3B, and 4 (31%) were GA - 3 C. The average time of distraction was 11.76 weeks (8-16). The average time for the union was 37 weeks (27-48 weeks). The average bone lengthening was 7.69 cm (5-13 cm). The mean final leg length discrepancy (LLD) at the final follow-up was 1.96 cm (0-4 cm). The primary union was achieved in eight cases, and five required bone grafting at the docking site. Using the ASAMI (Association for the Study of the Method of Ilizarov) scoring system, the functional results were excellent in six and good in seven cases, while the bony results were excellent in eight, good in four and fair in one case.
conclusionGood to excellent functional and radiological scores (ASAMI) can be expected when using the Ilizarov frame for simultaneous treatment of the large tibial bone and soft tissue defect when this method is applied with correct principles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39198329What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.