Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39198286›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2024

A deep learning approach for cervical cord injury severity determination through axial and sagittal magnetic resonance imaging segmentation and classification.

I Gusti Lanang Ngurah Agung Artha Wiguna, Yosi Kristian, Maria Florencia Deslivia, Rudi Limantara, David Cahyadi, Ivan Alexander Liando, Hendra Aryudi Hamzah, Kevin Kusuman, Dominicus Dimitri, Maria Anastasia and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

I Gusti Lanang Ngurah Agung Artha WigunaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Udayana University, Prof I G N G Ngoerah Hospital Jl. Diponegoro, Dauh Puri Klod, Denpasar, Bali, 80113, Indonesia. dr_lan2002@yahoo.com.
Yosi KristianInstitut Sains dan Teknologi Terpadu Surabaya, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
Maria Florencia DesliviaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, St Carolus Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Rudi LimantaraInstitut Sains dan Teknologi Terpadu Surabaya, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
David CahyadiInstitut Sains dan Teknologi Terpadu Surabaya, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
Ivan Alexander LiandoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Udayana University, Prof I G N G Ngoerah Hospital Jl. Diponegoro, Dauh Puri Klod, Denpasar, Bali, 80113, Indonesia.
Hendra Aryudi HamzahDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Udayana University, Prof I G N G Ngoerah Hospital Jl. Diponegoro, Dauh Puri Klod, Denpasar, Bali, 80113, Indonesia.
Kevin KusumanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Udayana University, Prof I G N G Ngoerah Hospital Jl. Diponegoro, Dauh Puri Klod, Denpasar, Bali, 80113, Indonesia.
Dominicus DimitriDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Udayana University, Prof I G N G Ngoerah Hospital Jl. Diponegoro, Dauh Puri Klod, Denpasar, Bali, 80113, Indonesia.
Maria AnastasiaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Udayana University, Prof I G N G Ngoerah Hospital Jl. Diponegoro, Dauh Puri Klod, Denpasar, Bali, 80113, Indonesia.
I Ketut SuyasaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Udayana University, Prof I G N G Ngoerah Hospital Jl. Diponegoro, Dauh Puri Klod, Denpasar, Bali, 80113, Indonesia.

Funding

AOSpine AOSEAR02205
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designCross-sectional Database Study.

objectiveWhile the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale is the standard for assessing spinal cord injuries (SCI), it has limitations due to subjectivity and impracticality. Advances in machine learning (ML) and image recognition have spurred research into their use for outcome prediction. This study aims to analyze deep learning techniques for identifying and classifying cervical SCI severity from MRI scans.

methodsThe study included patients with traumatic and nontraumatic cervical SCI admitted from 2019 to 2022. MRI images were labeled by two senior resident physicians. A deep convolutional neural network was trained using axial and sagittal cervical MRI images from the dataset. Model performance was assessed using Dice Score and IoU to measure segmentation accuracy by comparing predicted and ground truth masks. Classification accuracy was evaluated with the F1 Score, balancing false positives and negatives.

resultIn the axial spinal cord segmentation, we achieved a Dice score of 0.94 for and IoU score of 0.89. In the sagittal spinal cord segmentation, we obtained Dice score up to 0.9201 and IoU scores up to 0.8541. The model for axial image score classification gave a satisfactory result with an F1 score of 0.72 and AUC of 0.79.

conclusionOur models successfully identified cervical SCI on T2-weighted MR images with satisfactory performance. Further research is needed to develop more advanced models for predicting patient outcomes in SCI cases.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingSpinal Cord InjuriesAdultAgedCervical CordCervical VertebraeCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCervical spinal cord injuryDeep learningMachine learningMRI classificationSpinal cord injury

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.