Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39198101›Full record

ReviewContact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association2024

Artificial intelligence in corneal diseases: A narrative review.

Tuan Nguyen, Joshua Ong, Mouayad Masalkhi, Ethan Waisberg, Nasif Zaman, Prithul Sarker, Sarah Aman, Haotian Lin, Mingjie Luo, Renato Ambrosio and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. A Review of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology Imaging: Approximation to Ocular Histopathology.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Tuan NguyenWeill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan-Kettering Tri-Institutional MD-PhD Program, New York City, NY, United States. Electronic address: Tun2001@med.cornell.edu.
Joshua OngDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Mouayad MasalkhiUniversity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Ethan WaisbergUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Nasif ZamanHuman-Machine Perception Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, United States.
Prithul SarkerHuman-Machine Perception Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, United States.
Sarah AmanWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Haotian LinState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Mingjie LuoState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Renato AmbrosioFederal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Brazilian Artificial Intelligence Networking in Medicine, Rio de Janeiro and Alagoas, Brazil.
Aydano P MachadoFederal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Brazil; Brazilian Artificial Intelligence Networking in Medicine, Rio de Janeiro and Alagoas, Brazil.
Darren S J TingAcademic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom; Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Academic Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Jodhbir S MehtaSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore; Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Alireza TavakkoliHuman-Machine Perception Laboratory, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, United States.
Andrew G LeeThe Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States; Departments of Ophthalmology, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States; Texas A&M College of Medicine, TX, United States; Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, United States.

Funding

Weill Cornell/Rockefeller/Sloan Kettering MST ProgramT32GM152349 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI KATHARINE C HSU · 2024 to 2026
$6.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM152349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Corneal diseases represent a growing public health burden, especially in resource-limited settings lacking access to specialized eye care. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers promising solutions for automating the diagnosis and management of corneal conditions. This narrative review examines the application of AI in corneal diseases, focusing on keratoconus, infectious keratitis, pterygium, dry eye disease, Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy, and corneal transplantation. AI models integrating diverse imaging modalities (e.g., corneal topography, slit-lamp, and anterior segment OCT images) and clinical data have demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy, often outperforming human experts. Emerging trends include the incorporation of biomechanical data to enhance keratoconus detection, leveraging in vivo confocal microscopy for diagnosing infectious keratitis, and employing multimodal approaches for comprehensive disease analysis. Additionally, AI has shown potential in predicting disease progression, treatment outcomes, and postoperative complications in corneal transplantation. While challenges remain such as population heterogeneity, limited external validation, and the "black box" nature of some models, ongoing advancement in explainable AI, data augmentation, and improved regulatory frameworks can serve to address these limitations.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCorneal DiseasesHumansArtificial intelligenceCorneaDeep learningMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39198101
PMCPMC11581915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.