Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39197949›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2024

Presaccadic Attention Enhances and Reshapes the Contrast Sensitivity Function Differentially around the Visual Field.

Yuna Kwak, Yukai Zhao, Zhong-Lin Lu, Nina Maria Hanning, Marisa Carrasco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Visual adaptation stronger at the horizontal than the vertical meridian: Linking performance with V1 cortical surface area.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Presaccadic preview shapes postsaccadic processing more where perception is poor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. How the window of visibility varies around polar angle.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuna KwakDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York 10003 yuna.kwak@nyu.edu marisa.carrasco@nyu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4298-1981
Yukai ZhaoCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York 10003.
Zhong-Lin LuDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York 10003.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7295-727X
Nina Maria HanningDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York 10003.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3640-1151
Marisa CarrascoDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, New York 10003 yuna.kwak@nyu.edu marisa.carrasco@nyu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1002-9056

Funding

Linking brain and behavior 'around' the visual fieldR01EY027401 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CARRASCO, MARISA, WINAWER, JONATHAN A · 2017 to 2025
$2.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contrast sensitivity (CS), which constrains human vision, decreases from fovea to periphery, from the horizontal to the vertical meridian, and from the lower vertical to the upper vertical meridian. It also depends on spatial frequency (SF), and the contrast sensitivity function (CSF) depicts this relation. To compensate for these visual constraints, we constantly make saccades and foveate on relevant objects in the scene. Already before saccade onset, presaccadic attention shifts to the saccade target and enhances perception. However, it is unknown whether and how it modulates the interplay between CS and SF, and if this effect varies around polar angle meridians. CS enhancement may result from a horizontal or vertical shift of the CSF, increase in bandwidth, or any combination. In addition, presaccadic attention could enhance CS similarly around the visual field, or it could benefit perception more at locations with poorer performance (i.e., vertical meridian). Here, we investigated these possibilities by extracting key attributes of the CSF of human observers. The results reveal that presaccadic attention (1) increases CS across SF, (2) increases the most preferred and the highest discernable SF, and (3) narrows the bandwidth. Therefore, presaccadic attention helps bridge the gap between presaccadic and postsaccadic input by increasing visibility at the saccade target. Counterintuitively, this CS enhancement was more pronounced where perception is better-along the horizontal than the vertical meridian-exacerbating polar angle asymmetries. Our results call for an investigation of the differential neural modulations underlying presaccadic perceptual changes for different saccade directions.

Indexed as

AttentionContrast SensitivitySaccadesVisual FieldsAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationVisual PerceptionYoung Adultcontrast sensitivitycontrast sensitivity functionperceptual asymmetriespolar anglepresaccadic attentionsaccade

Identifiers

PMID39197949
PMCPMC11397507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.