ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2024
Patient-Specific Rods in Adolescent and Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Narrative Review.
Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Optical Tracking-Based Robot-Assisted System for Spinal Fixation Rod Bending.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Measurement and Analysis of Rod Deformation for Spinal Deformity Correction: A Novel Methodology.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis between mono-axial and poly-axial screws and their effect on rod and spine curvature mismatch in treatment of adult spinal deformity.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Article
- Improved immediate postoperative T4-L1 hip axis with use of pre-contoured patient-specific rods versus surgeon-contoured rods in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Article
- Article
- Utility of Enabling Technologies in Spinal Deformity Surgery: Optimizing Surgical Planning and Intraoperative Execution to Maximize Patient Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spinal deformity surgery often requires complex surgical interventions that can have a drastic effect on both patient quality of life and functional capacity. Modern-day corrective solutions for these deformities include spinal osteotomies, pedicle screw instrumentation, and dual/multirod constructs. These solutions are efficacious and are currently considered standard practice for spinal surgeons, but they lack individualization. Patient-specific rods (PSRs) are a novel technology that attempts to offer a personalized approach to spinal deformity correction based on preoperative computerized tomography scans. Moreover, PSRs may offer several advantages to conventional rods, which include achievement of desired rod contour angles according to surgical planning alignment goals, reduced operative time, and reduced blood loss. In adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, those instrumented with PSR have observed coronal Cobb reductions up to 74%. In adult spinal deformity, PSRs have offered superior correction in radiographic parameters such as sagittal vertical axis and pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis. However, there still remains a paucity of research in this area, mainly in health care expenditure, cost-effectiveness, and longitudinal clinical outcomes. The purpose of this article is to survey the current body of knowledge of PSR instrumentation in both adolescent and adult spinal deformity populations. The current strength, limitations, and future directions of PSRs are highlighted throughout this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.