Trial reportRespirology (Carlton, Vic.)2025
Safety and efficacy of a novel transbronchial radiofrequency ablation system for lung tumours: One year follow-up from the first multi-centre large-scale clinical trial (BRONC-RFII).
Trial report in Respirology (Carlton, Vic.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and efficacy of a novel transbronchial radiofrequency ablation system for lung tumours: One year follow-up from the first multi-centre large-scale clinical trial (BRONC-RFII).Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2025Trial
- Bronchoscopic Ablation and Intratumoral Therapies for Lung Cancer: Expanding Local Treatment Beyond Surgical Resection.Cancers · 2026Review
- Ion Robotic Bronchoscopy-Guided Microwave Ablation Under Augmented Fluoroscopy: An Initial Case Series and Comparative Procedural Workflow Analysis.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Annual progress in transbronchial diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary malignant tumors [2025]: a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Review
- Mid-term efficacy and safety of transbronchial cryoablation for stage IA peripheral lung cancer: a retrospective analysis.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Shape-Sensing Robotic-Assisted Bronchoscopic Cryoablation for Primary and Metastatic Pulmonary Nodules: Feasibility, Safety, and Early Outcomes.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2026Article
- Quality and reliability of ground-glass nodule-related short Chinese videos on TikTok and Bilibili: a cross-sectional content analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Research status and trend of lung cancer ablation therapy: a bibliometric analysis from 2002 to 2025.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Multiple ground-glass nodules after lobectomy for multiple primary lung cancer: a case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- The unified front: a multidisciplinary approach in the Era of uniportal thoracic surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Bronchoscopic ablation for non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Review
- Robotic-assisted and electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy for multi-focal lung cancers: a narrative review.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Review
- Comparative study of bronchoscopic and CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Safety and efficacy of transbronchial radiofrequency ablation for stage IA peripheral lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Shape sensing robotic assisted bronchoscopy versus virtual bronchoscopic navigation in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary nodules.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Archimedes navigation system-guided bronchoscopic trans-parenchymal nodule access for peripheral lung nodules: a single-center experience.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Robotic-assisted bronchoscopy-advancing lung cancer management.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveRadiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an emerging treatment of lung cancer, yet it is accompanied by certain safety concerns and operational limitations. This first multi-centre, large-scale clinical trial aimed to investigate the technical performance, efficacy and safety of an innovative transbronchial RFA system for lung tumours.
methodsThe study enrolled patients with malignant lung tumours who underwent transbronchial RFA using an automatic saline microperfusion system between January 2021 and December 2021 across 16 medical centres. The primary endpoint was the complete ablation rate. The performance and safety of the technique, along with the 1-year survival rates, were evaluated.
resultsThis study included 126 patients (age range: 23-85 years) with 130 lung tumours (mean size: 18.77 × 14.15 mm) who had undergone 153 transbronchial RFA sessions, with a technique success rate of 99.35% and an average ablation zone size of 32.47 mm. At the 12-month follow-up, the complete ablation rate and intrapulmonary progression-free survival rates were 90.48% and 88.89%, respectively. The results of patients with ground-glass nodules (GGNs) were superior to those of the patients with solid nodules (12-month complete ablation rates: solid vs. pure GGN vs. mixed GGN: 82.14% vs. 100% vs. 96.08%, p = 0.007). No device defects were reported. Complications such as pneumothorax, haemoptysis, pleural effusion, pulmonary infection and pleural pain were observed in 3.97%, 6.35%, 8.73%, 11.11% and 10.32% of patients, respectively. Two subjects died during the follow-up period.
conclusionTransbronchial RFA utilizing an automatic saline microperfusion system is a viable, safe and efficacious approach for the treatment for lung tumours, particularly for patients with GGNs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.