ArticleJournal of pain and symptom management2024
Addressing Statistical Power and Increasing Diversity in Hospice Research: Electronic Medical Record Participant Identification Compared to Nurse Referral Approaches to Recruitment.
Article in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextRecruitment of targeted samples into hospice clinical trials is often challenging. While electronic medical records (EMR) are commonly used in hospital-based research, it is uncommon in hospice research. The community setting and the variability in hospices and their medical record creates unique challenges.
objectivesThis paper compares recruitment in two hospice randomized controlled trials, each of which had a group recruited by using the EMR identification and a group recruited by nurse referral. We sought to answer three questions: 1) What is the impact of using the EMR to identify hospice participants for clinical research? 2) How do the referral count and consent rate (referrals that ultimately result in verbal informed consent to participate in research) differ between hospice agencies using an EMR participant identification approach compared to those using a nurse referral approach? and 3) What are the challenges associated with using the EMR to identify potential research participants?
methodRecruitment data from two hospice clinical trials was combined into a new database. Data from hospice nurse referral agencies was compared with data from those agencies who participated in EMR-identified referrals.
resultsThe EMR identification process was feasible and efficient, resulting in more referrals and more consented participants than the nurse referral method. Of particular interest is that 8% more black caregivers were recruited using the EMR identification process than the nurse referral.
conclusionsThe EMR-identified recruitment process is the recommended method in hospice research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.