Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39197222›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2024

Developing a low-cost, open-source, locally manufactured workstation and computational pipeline for automated histopathology evaluation using deep learning.

Divya Choudhury, James M Dolezal, Emma Dyer, Sara Kochanny, Siddhi Ramesh, Frederick M Howard, Jayson R Margalus, Amelia Schroeder, Jefree Schulte, Marina C Garassino and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Digital pathology in tau research: A comparison of QuPath and HALO.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Divya ChoudhuryPritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
James M DolezalGeisinger Cancer Institute, Danville, PA, USA.
Emma DyerSection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Sara KochannySection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Siddhi RameshPritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Frederick M HowardSection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jayson R MargalusDePaul University, Idea Realization Lab, Chicago, IL, USA.
Amelia SchroederDePaul University, Idea Realization Lab, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jefree SchulteDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, USA.
Marina C GarassinoSection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jakob N KatherDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Applied Tumor Immunity, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Alexander T PearsonSection of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA. Electronic address: apearson5@uchicago.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeployment and access to state-of-the-art precision medicine technologies remains a fundamental challenge in providing equitable global cancer care in low-resource settings. The expansion of digital pathology in recent years and its potential interface with diagnostic artificial intelligence algorithms provides an opportunity to democratize access to personalized medicine. Current digital pathology workstations, however, cost thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars. As cancer incidence rises in many low- and middle-income countries, the validation and implementation of low-cost automated diagnostic tools will be crucial to helping healthcare providers manage the growing burden of cancer.

methodsHere we describe a low-cost ($230) workstation for digital slide capture and computational analysis composed of open-source components. We analyze the predictive performance of deep learning models when they are used to evaluate pathology images captured using this open-source workstation versus images captured using common, significantly more expensive hardware. Validation studies assessed model performance on three distinct datasets and predictive models: head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HPV positive versus HPV negative), lung cancer (adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma), and breast cancer (invasive ductal carcinoma versus invasive lobular carcinoma).

findingsWhen compared to traditional pathology image capture methods, low-cost digital slide capture and analysis with the open-source workstation, including the low-cost microscope device, was associated with model performance of comparable accuracy for breast, lung, and HNSCC classification. At the patient level of analysis, AUROC was 0.84 for HNSCC HPV status prediction, 1.0 for lung cancer subtype prediction, and 0.80 for breast cancer classification.

interpretationOur ability to maintain model performance despite decreased image quality and low-power computational hardware demonstrates that it is feasible to massively reduce costs associated with deploying deep learning models for digital pathology applications. Improving access to cutting-edge diagnostic tools may provide an avenue for reducing disparities in cancer care between high- and low-income regions.

fundingFunding for this project including personnel support was provided via grants from NIH/NCIR25-CA240134, NIH/NCIU01-CA243075, NIH/NIDCRR56-DE030958, NIH/NCIR01-CA276652, NIH/NCIK08-CA283261, NIH/NCI-SOAR25CA240134, SU2C (Stand Up to Cancer) Fanconi Anemia Research Fund - Farrah Fawcett Foundation Head and Neck Cancer Research Team Grant, and the European UnionHorizon Program (I3LUNG).

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsComputational BiologyHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeoplasmsCancer diagnosticsDigital pathologyGlobal healthLow-cost microscopeMachine learningOpen-sourcePrecision oncology

Identifiers

PMID39197222
PMCPMC11399610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.