Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39196989›Full record

Trial reportEuropean heart journal2024

Optical coherence tomography predictors of clinical outcomes after stent implantation: the ILUMIEN IV trial.

Ulf Landmesser, Ziad A Ali, Akiko Maehara, Mitsuaki Matsumura, Richard A Shlofmitz, Giulio Guagliumi, Matthew J Price, Jonathan M Hill, Takashi Akasaka, Francesco Prati and 16 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in European heart journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Intravascular Imaging for Facilitated Coronary Interventions in DES Era.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Optical Coherence Tomography in Acute Coronary Syndromes.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Ulf LandmesserDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Deutsches Herzzentrum Charité, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0214-3203
Ziad A AliSt. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA.
Akiko MaeharaCardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1910-8447
Mitsuaki MatsumuraCardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2082-0247
Richard A ShlofmitzSt. Francis Hospital, Roslyn, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9422-048X
Giulio GuagliumiIRCCS Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio Hospital, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6814-2003
Matthew J PriceDivision of Cardiovascular Diseases, Scripps Clinic, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Jonathan M HillRoyal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
Takashi AkasakaWakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan.
Francesco PratiSaint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, CLI Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Hiram G BezerraTampa General Hospital, Tampa, FL.ORCID 0000-0002-4968-7945
William WijnsThe Lambe Institute for Translational Medehance Spicine and Curam, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-7267-4376
David LeistnerDepartment of Medicine, Cardiology, Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4351-420X
Paolo CanovaOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3594-2853
Fernando AlfonsoCardiology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, CIBERCV, IIS-IP, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1119-239X
Franco FabbiocchiIRCCS Galeazzi Sant'Ambrogio Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe CalligarisDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Milan, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8991-0956
Rohit M OemrawsinghAlbert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3617-3929
Stephan AchenbachDepartment of Cardiology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7596-095X
Carlo TraniFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9777-013X
Balbir SinghMax Super Specialty Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India.
Robert J McGreevyAbbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-9473-1798
Robert W McNuttAbbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA.
Shih-Wa YingAbbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA.
Jana BuccolaAbbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA.
Gregg W StoneThe Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3416-8210

Funding

Abbott
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsObservational registries have suggested that optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging-derived parameters may predict adverse events after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. The present analysis sought to determine the OCT predictors of clinical outcomes from the large-scale ILUMIEN IV trial.

methodsILUMIEN IV was a prospective, single-blind trial of 2487 patients with diabetes or high-risk lesions randomized to OCT-guided versus angiography-guided DES implantation. All patients underwent final OCT imaging (blinded in the angiography-guided arm). From more than 20 candidates, the independent OCT predictors of 2-year target lesion failure (TLF; the primary endpoint), cardiac death or target-vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR), and stent thrombosis were analysed by multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression in single treated lesions.

resultsA total of 2128 patients had a single treated lesion with core laboratory-analysed final OCT. The 2-year Kaplan-Meier rates of TLF, cardiac death or TV-MI, ID-TLR, and stent thrombosis were 6.3% (n = 130), 3.3% (n = 68), 4.3% (n = 87), and 0.9% (n = 18), respectively. The independent predictors of 2-year TLF were a smaller minimal stent area (per 1 mm2 increase: hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.68-0.89, P < .0001) and proximal edge dissection (hazard ratio 1.77, 95% confidence interval 1.20-2.62, P = .004). The independent predictors of cardiac death or TV-MI were smaller minimal stent area and longer stent length; of ID-TLR were smaller intra-stent flow area and proximal edge dissection; and of stent thrombosis was smaller minimal stent expansion.

conclusionsIn the ILUMIEN IV trial, the most important OCT-derived post-DES predictors of both safety and effectiveness outcomes were parameters related to stent area, expansion and flow, proximal edge dissection, and stent length.

Indexed as

Drug-Eluting StentsTomography, Optical CoherenceAgedCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionProspective StudiesSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeOptical coherence tomographyPercutaneous coronary interventionPrognosisStent

Identifiers

PMID39196989
PMCPMC11560276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.