Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39196921›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Conserved amino acid residues and gene expression patterns associated with the substrate preferences of the competing enzymes FLS and DFR.

Nancy Choudhary, Boas Pucker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparative transcriptomics of anthocyanin accumulation in the pericarp of pigmented purple corn.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout ofFrontiers in genome editing · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nancy ChoudharyInstitute of Plant Biology & BRICS, Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, TU Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Boas PuckerInstitute of Plant Biology & BRICS, Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, TU Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3321-7471

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlavonoids, an important class of specialized metabolites, are synthesized from phenylalanine and present in almost all plant species. Different branches of flavonoid biosynthesis lead to products like flavones, flavonols, anthocyanins, and proanthocyanidins. Dihydroflavonols form the branching point towards the production of non-colored flavonols via flavonol synthase (FLS) and colored anthocyanins via dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR). Despite the wealth of publicly accessible data, there remains a gap in understanding the mechanisms that mitigate competition between FLS and DFR for the shared substrate, dihydroflavonols.

resultsAn angiosperm-wide comparison of FLS and DFR sequences revealed the amino acids at positions associated with the substrate specificity in both enzymes. A global analysis of the phylogenetic distribution of these amino acid residues revealed that monocots generally possess FLS with Y132 (FLSY) and DFR with N133 (DFRN). In contrast, dicots generally possess FLSH and DFRN, DFRD, and DFRA. DFRA, which restricts substrate preference to dihydrokaempferol, previously believed to be unique to strawberry species, is found to be more widespread in angiosperms and has evolved independently multiple times. Generally, angiosperm FLS appears to prefer dihydrokaempferol, whereas DFR appears to favor dihydroquercetin or dihydromyricetin. Moreover, in the FLS-DFR competition, the dominance of one over the other is observed, with typically only one gene being expressed at any given time.

conclusionThis study illustrates how almost mutually exclusive gene expression and substrate-preference determining residues could mitigate competition between FLS and DFR, delineates the evolution of these enzymes, and provides insights into mechanisms directing the metabolic flux of the flavonoid biosynthesis, with potential implications for ornamental plants and molecular breeding strategies.

Indexed as

Alcohol OxidoreductasesGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant ProteinsAmino Acid SequenceConserved SequenceFlavonoidsMagnoliopsidaOxidoreductasesPhylogenySubstrate SpecificityAlcohol Oxidoreductasesdihydroflavanol 4-reductaseFlavonoidsflavonol synthaseOxidoreductasesPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID39196921
PMCPMC11356453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.