Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39196881›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Financing health in sub-Saharan Africa 1990-2050: Donor dependence and expected domestic health spending.

Angela E Apeagyei, Brendan Lidral-Porter, Nishali Patel, Juan Solorio, Golsum Tsakalos, Yifeng Wang, Wesley Warriner, Asrat Wolde, Yingxi Zhao, Joseph L Dieleman and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Angela E ApeagyeiDepartment of Health Metrics Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0190-1017
Brendan Lidral-PorterInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Nishali PatelInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6273-4999
Juan SolorioInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Golsum TsakalosInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Yifeng WangInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Wesley WarrinerInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Asrat WoldeInstitute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5396-9937
Yingxi ZhaoNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4937-4703
Joseph L DielemanDepartment of Health Metrics Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7976-7412
Justice NonvignonDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2021, global life expectancy at birth was 74 years whereas in sub-Saharan Africa it was 66 years. Yet in that same year, $92 per person was spent on health in sub- Saharan Africa, which is roughly one fifth of what the next lowest geographic region-North Africa and Middle East-spent ($379). The challenges to healthy lives in sub-Saharan Africa are many while health spending remains low. This study uses gross domestic product, government, and health spending data to give a more complete picture of the patterns of future health spending in sub-Saharan Africa. We analyzed trends in growth in gross domestic product, government health spending, development assistance for health and the prioritization of health in national spending to compare countries within sub-Saharan Africa and globally.We found that while gross domestic product was projected to increase through 2050 in sub-Saharan Africa, the share of gross domestic product that goes to health spending is only expected to increase moderately. Our exploration shows that this tepid growth is expected because the percent of overall government spending that is dedicated to health 7·2% (6·3-8·3) compared to average of 12·4% (11·7-13·2) in other regions) is expected to stay low. Even if the amount, of resources provided from donors climbs some, it is not expected to keep pace with growing economies in sub-Saharan Africa and may transition towards other global public health goods. Critically, development assistance for health provided to sub-Saharan Africa is expected to decrease in some countries, and the expected growth in government health spending might not be enough to cover this expected decline. Increases in spending with a concordant prioritization of health and the appropriate health system governance and structural reforms are critical to ensure that people who live in sub-Saharan Africa are not left behind.

Identifiers

PMID39196881
PMCPMC11355530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.