Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39196880›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

AI can see you: Machiavellianism and extraversion are reflected in eye-movements.

Elina Tsigeman, Viktoria Zemliak, Maxim Likhanov, Kostas A Papageorgiou, Yulia Kovas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elina TsigemanLaboratory for Social & Cognitive Informatics, HSE University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7966-5982
Viktoria ZemliakUniversity of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2050-7290
Maxim LikhanovState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Kostas A PapageorgiouSchool of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6458-9158
Yulia KovasDepartment of Psychology, Goldsmiths University of London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9633-6374

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRecent studies showed an association between personality traits and individual patterns of visual behaviour in laboratory and other settings. The current study extends previous research by measuring multiple personality traits in natural settings; and by comparing accuracy of prediction of multiple machine learning algorithms.

methodsAdolescent participants (N = 35) completed personality questionnaires (Big Five Inventory and Short Dark Triad Questionnaire) and visited an interactive museum while their eye movements were recorded with head-mounted eye tracking. To predict personality traits the eye-movement data was analysed using eight machine-learning methods: Random Forest, Adaboost, Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, k Nearest Neighbours, Decision Tree and a three-layer Perceptron. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Extracted eye movement features introduced to machine learning algorithms predicted personality traits with above 33% chance accuracy (34%-48%). This result is comparable to previous ecologically valid studies, but lower than in laboratory-based research. Better prediction was achieved for Machiavellianism and Extraversion compared to other traits (10 and 9 predictions above the chance level by different algorithms from different parts of the recording). Conscientiousness, Narcissism and Psychopathy were not reliably predicted from eye movements. These differences in predictability across traits might be explained by differential activation of different traits in different situations, such as new vs. familiar, exciting vs. boring, and complex vs. simple settings. In turn, different machine learning approaches seem to be better at capturing specific gaze patterns (e.g. saccades), associated with specific traits evoked by the situation. Further research is needed to gain better insights into trait-situation-algorithm interactions.

Indexed as

Extraversion, PsychologicalEye MovementsMachiavellianismMachine LearningAdolescentAlgorithmsEye-Tracking TechnologyFemaleHumansMalePersonalitySurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39196880
PMCPMC11355565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.