Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39196876›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2024

The application of Borg scale in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: An integrative review.

Lucia Tobase, Sandra Helena Cardoso, Renata Tavares Franco Rodrigues, Dhieizom Rodrigo de Souza, Debora Gugelmin-Almeida, Thatiane Facholi Polastri, Heloisa Helena Ciqueto Peres, Sergio Timerman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lucia TobaseSão Camilo University Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sandra Helena CardosoSchool of Nursing at the University of São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5017-0476
Renata Tavares Franco RodriguesSchool of Nursing at the University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Dhieizom Rodrigo de SouzaHeart Institute of the Hospital das Clínicas of the Faculty of Medicine of University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Debora Gugelmin-AlmeidaBournemouth University, Bournemouth, England.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4524-8793
Thatiane Facholi PolastriHeart Institute of the Hospital das Clínicas of the Faculty of Medicine of University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Heloisa Helena Ciqueto PeresSchool of Nursing at the University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Sergio TimermanHeart Institute of the Hospital das Clínicas of the Faculty of Medicine of University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of human performance and perception of exertion constitutes a fundamental aspect for monitoring health implications and enhancing training outcomes such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). It involves gaining insights into the varied responses and tolerance levels exhibited by individuals engaging in physical activities. To measure perception of exertion, many tools are available, including the Borg scale. In order to evaluate how the Borg scale is being used during CPR attempts, this integrative review was carried out between October/2020 and December/2023, with searches from PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO and VHL. Full publications relevant to the PICO strategy were included and letters, editorials, abstracts, and unpublished studies were excluded. In total, 34 articles were selected and categorised into three themes: a) CPR performed in different contexts; b) CPR performed in different cycles, positions, and techniques; c) CPR performed with additional technological resources. Because CPR performance is considered a strenuous physical activity, the Borg scale was used in each study to evaluate perception of exertion. The results identified that the Borg scale has been used during CPR in different contexts. It is a quick, low-cost, and easy-to-apply tool that provides important indicators that may affect CPR quality, such as perception of exertion, likely improving performance and potentially increasing the chances of survival.

Identifiers

PMID39196876
PMCPMC11355535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.