Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39196871›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

How do soundboard-trained dogs respond to human button presses? An investigation into word comprehension.

Amalia P M Bastos, Ashley Evenson, Patrick M Wood, Zachary N Houghton, Lucas Naranjo, Gabriella E Smith, Alexandria Cairo-Evans, Lisa Korpos, Jack Terwilliger, Sarita Raghunath and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Animal Welfare, Agency, and Animal-Computer Interaction.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Amalia P M BastosDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3037-687X
Ashley EvensonCollege of Arts and Sciences, Canisius College, Buffalo, New York, United States of America.
Patrick M WoodDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Zachary N HoughtonDepartment of Linguistics, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
Lucas NaranjoFluentPet, Inc, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Gabriella E SmithComparative Cognition, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Alexandria Cairo-EvansDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8647-5765
Lisa KorposDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Jack TerwilligerDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Sarita RaghunathDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0002-2178-1857
Cassandra PaulDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Hairou HouDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Federico RossanoDepartment of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6544-7685

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Past research on interspecies communication has shown that animals can be trained to use Augmentative Interspecies Communication (AIC) devices, such as soundboards, to make simple requests of their caretakers. The recent uptake in AIC devices by hundreds of pet owners around the world offers a novel opportunity to investigate whether AIC is possible with owner-trained family dogs. To answer this question, we carried out two studies to test pet dogs' ability to recognise and respond appropriately to food-related, play-related, and outside-related words on their soundboards. One study was conducted by researchers, and the other by citizen scientists who followed the same procedure. Further, we investigated whether these behaviours depended on the identity of the person presenting the word (unfamiliar person or dog's owner) and the mode of its presentation (spoken or produced by a pressed button). We find that dogs produced contextually appropriate behaviours for both play-related and outside-related words regardless of the identity of the person producing them and the mode in which they were produced. Therefore, pet dogs can be successfully taught by their owners to associate words recorded onto soundboard buttons to their outcomes in the real world, and they respond appropriately to these words even when they are presented in the absence of any other cues, such as the owner's body language.

Indexed as

ComprehensionAnimalsDogsFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID39196871
PMCPMC11355551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.