Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39196818›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2024

An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Analysis of Factors Contributing to Students' Perceptions of Inclusion in Introductory STEM Courses.

Alessandra M York, Kathryn G Miller, Michael J Cahill, Mindy A Bernstein, Ashton M Barber, Hannah E Blomgren, Regina F Frey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alessandra M YorkCenter for Integrative Research on Cognition, Learning, and Education, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130.
Kathryn G MillerDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130.
Michael J CahillCenter for Integrative Research on Cognition, Learning, and Education, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130.
Mindy A BernsteinCenter for Integrative Research on Cognition, Learning, and Education, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130.
Ashton M BarberCenter for Integrative Research on Cognition, Learning, and Education, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130.
Hannah E BlomgrenDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
Regina F FreyDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this exploratory mixed-methods analysis of students' perceptions of inclusion in introductory STEM courses for STEM majors, we asked students to rate inclusion in their class and to provide an open-text explanation of their rating. Analyzing 1930 qualitative responses resulted in a codebook containing academic, identity, and nonspecific categories. The majority of responses (>80%) cited academic factors such as interactions between students and instructors or course elements and policies. Most academic responses aligned with evidence-based teaching practices fostering inclusion, describing a range of strategies and policies instructors can implement to increase students' perceptions of inclusion. A small number of student responses indicated that their perception of the required knowledge background for the course impacted course inclusivity. Few differences in frequency distributions were found between subgroups examined (gender, race and ethnicity, self-reported inclusion score, and discipline). Additionally, tracking a subset of students (135) across three courses revealed that most (80%) cited different factors influencing their perception of inclusion in each course. This suggests students' perceptions of inclusive practices are complex, and most students recognize multiple factors that influence their inclusion. Overall, our findings suggest instructors can significantly influence students' perceptions of inclusion by using multiple inclusive teaching strategies and course policies.

Indexed as

CurriculumPerceptionStudentsEngineeringFemaleHumansMaleMathematicsScienceTechnology

Identifiers

PMID39196818
PMCPMC11440732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.