Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39196716›Full record

ArticleUrology practice2024

Targeted Ablation Using Ultrasound-Guided Irreversible Electroporation of Index Tumors (TARGET Study): Prospective Development Study Evaluating Safety, Patient-Reported Outcomes, and Oncologic Efficacy.

Jonathan Fainberg, Taehyoung Lee, Emily A Vertosick, Arjun Sivaraman, Gregory Chesnut, Samson W Fine, James Eastham, Jonathan Coleman, Behfar Ehdaie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jonathan FainbergMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Urology Division, New York, New York.
Taehyoung LeeMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Urology Division, New York, New York.
Emily A VertosickMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Urology Division, New York, New York.
Arjun SivaramanMedical College of Wisconsin, Department of Urology, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Gregory ChesnutMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Urology Division, New York, New York.
Samson W FineMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Pathology, New York, New York.
James EasthamMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Urology Division, New York, New York.
Jonathan ColemanMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Urology Division, New York, New York.
Behfar EhdaieMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Surgery, Urology Division, New York, New York.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe studied patient-reported functional outcomes, safety, and oncologic efficacy of focal irreversible electroporation as a primary treatment for intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

methodsBetween February 2015 and April 2017, 20 consecutive patients elected irreversible electroporation and underwent 22 treatments. All underwent MRI-targeted and systematic transrectal biopsies. Eligibility criteria were grade group 2/3 prostate cancer in a maximum of 2 adjacent sextant prostate sectors in 1 hemigland without extraprostatic extension on MRI. Ablation was performed with a 5-mm cancer margin. Any grade group 1 cancer outside mapped index lesion was untreated. Outcome measures were based on the Prostate Quality of Life Survey, Male Sexual Health Questionnaire, and MRI-targeted and systematic biopsies at 3 and 12 months.

resultsNineteen patients completed irreversible electroporation. One had electrocardiographic changes, and irreversible electroporation was aborted. No deterioration was detected in urinary or sexual domains (-0.2, 95% CI -1.4, 0.9,

conclusionsOur data show promising oncologic and functional outcomes following focal irreversible electroporation treatment for carefully selected patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Further research should compare irreversible electroporation with active surveillance.

Indexed as

ElectroporationPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProstatic NeoplasmsUltrasonography, InterventionalAblation TechniquesAgedHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment Outcomeablation techniquesfocal therapyirreversible electroporationprostatic neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID39196716
PMCPMC11507127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.