ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences2024
Does Pain Explain Trends in Disability? An Analysis of Middle-Aged and Older U.S. Adults, 2002-2018.
Article in The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Which is More Predictive of Mortality-Pain Severity or Pain Interference? Evidence from 20-Year Longitudinal Data.The journal of pain · 2026Observational
- Educational Disparities in Disability in Mid- to Late-Life: How Much is Attributable to Pain?Journal of aging and health · 2026Article
- Beyond pain presence: the impact of multisite pain and pain interference on cognitive functioning among middle-aged and older adults.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026Article
- Integrative Treatment Strategies for Chronic Back Pain: A Literature Review with Clinical Recommendations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis article investigates the role of pain in disability trends in the United States, within the context of recent unfavorable disability trends and the concurrent rise in pain.
methodsWe conducted a 2-part analysis using National Health Interview Survey data from 2002 to 2018 for U.S. adults aged 45-84. First, we assessed how changes in the prevalence of 5 site-specific types of pain (headaches/migraines, joint, low back, neck, and facial/jaw pain) associated with disability trends. Second, we used self-reported causes of disability and examined whether there has been a change in the proportion of individuals who attribute their disability to 1 of 5 chronic or acute painful conditions.
resultsThe 5 site-specific types of pain, individually and collectively, were significantly associated with increases in disability. If site-specific chronic pain had not increased during the study period, the trend for functional limitations would have been 40% lower, and that for activity limitations would have shown a slight decline instead of an increase. Attributions of functional limitations to painful conditions increased by 23% during the 2002-2018 period, representing an additional 9.82 million Americans experiencing pain-attributable disability. Arthritis/rheumatism, back/neck problems, and other musculoskeletal/connective conditions were the primary sources of pain-related disability. DISCUSSION: Our research provides the first systematic, national examination of how pain is contributing to disability trends in the United States. The findings have implications for disability reduction policies and shed light on the far-reaching consequences of pain for overall population health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.