Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39196546›Full record

Observational studyInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024

Long-Term Prediction and Risk Factors for Incident Visual Field Defect in Nonpathologic High Myopia.

Cong Li, Yanping Chen, Shaopeng Yang, Ruilin Xiong, Riqian Liu, Ziyu Zhu, Shida Chen, Mingguang He, Wei Wang

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cong LiState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Yanping ChenState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Shaopeng YangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Ruilin XiongState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Riqian LiuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Ziyu ZhuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Shida ChenState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Mingguang HeState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.
Wei WangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Ocular Diseases, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the long-term patterns and risk factors of visual field defect (VFD) development in nonpathologic high myopia (HM) over an 8-year follow-up. Methods: This was an observational cohort study. The VFD classification adhered to the Glaucoma Suspects with High Myopia Study Group. Logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations were used to identify risk factors for VFD development. Results: A total of 330 eyes from 194 patients were included. Among them, 49.4% of eyes developed VFD, with enlarged blind spot and nonspecific defect ranked as the most common VFDs, followed by partial arcuate defect, vertical step, nasal step, paracentral defect, and combined defects. Longer axial length (odds ratio [OR] = 1.43 per 1-mm increase; 95% CI, 1.04-1.95; P = 0.026), thinner central corneal thickness (OR = 1.01 per 1-µm decrease; 95% CI, 1.003-1.02; P = 0.013), worse mean deviation of visual field (OR = 1.51 per 1-dB decrease; 95% CI, 1.14-2.00; P = 0.004), and the presence of peripapillary γ-zone (OR = 5.57; 95% CI, 3.06-10.15; P < 0.001) at baseline correlated with the development of any VFD. By incorporating these factors, the prediction models achieved area under the curves of 0.789 (95% CI, 0.726-0.853) and 0.828 (95% CI, 0.714-0.943) for discriminating the development of any VFD and moderate/severe VFD, respectively, with good calibration power. Conclusions: The development of VFD occurred frequently in individuals with nonpathologic HM and can be effectively predicted using relevant metrics. The findings will aid in expanding our knowledge of optic neuropathy in HM.

Indexed as

Myopia, DegenerativeVisual FieldsVisual Field TestsAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsVision Disorders

Identifiers

PMID39196546
PMCPMC11364189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.