Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39196527›Full record

ArticleDoklady. Biochemistry and biophysics2024

Error-Prone DNA Synthesis on Click-Ligated Templates.

A V Endutkin, A O Yakovlev, T D Zharkov, V M Golyshev, A V Yudkina, D O Zharkov

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Doklady. Biochemistry and biophysics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A V EndutkinInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
A O YakovlevInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
T D ZharkovInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
V M GolyshevInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
A V YudkinaInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
D O ZharkovInstitute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia. dzharkov@niboch.nsc.ru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Click ligation is a technology of joining DNA fragments based on azide-alkyne cycloaddition. In the most common variant, click ligation introduces a 4-methyl-1,2,3-triazole (trz) group instead of the phosphodiester bond between two adjacent nucleosides. While this linkage is believed to be biocompatible, little is known about the possibility of its recognition by DNA repair systems or its potential for DNA polymerase stalling and miscoding. Here we report that trz linkage is resistant to several human and bacterial endonucleases involved in DNA repair. At the same time, it strongly blocks some DNA polymerases (Pfu, DNA polymerase β) while allowing bypass by others (phage RB69 polymerase, Klenow fragment). All polymerases, except for DNA polymerase β, showed high frequency of misinsertion at the trz site, incorporating dAMP instead of the next complementary nucleotide. Thus, click ligation can be expected to produce a large amount of errors if used in custom gene synthesis.

Indexed as

Click ChemistryDNAAzidesDNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA RepairHumansTemplates, GeneticTriazolesAzidesDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseTriazolesAP endonucleasesclick chemistryDNA polymerasesDNA repairmutationsreplication

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.