Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39196484›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2024

APPROACH e-PROM system: a user-centered development and evaluation of an electronic patient-reported outcomes measurement system for management of coronary artery disease.

Andrew Roberts, Eleanor Benterud, Maria J Santana, Jordan Engbers, Christine Lorenz, Nancy Verdin, Winnie Pearson, Peter Edgar, Joel Adekanye, Pantea Javaheri and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Andrew RobertsFaculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Eleanor BenterudDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Maria J SantanaDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW Calgary, Calgary, T4B 4B2, Canada.
Jordan EngbersCohesic Inc, Calgary, Canada.
Christine LorenzCohesic Inc, Calgary, Canada.
Nancy VerdinDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW Calgary, Calgary, T4B 4B2, Canada.
Winnie PearsonDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW Calgary, Calgary, T4B 4B2, Canada.
Peter EdgarFaculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Joel AdekanyeDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW Calgary, Calgary, T4B 4B2, Canada.
Pantea JavaheriLibin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Courtney E MacDonaldWard of the 21st Century, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Sarah SimmonsWard of the 21st Century, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Sandra ZelinskyDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW Calgary, Calgary, T4B 4B2, Canada.
Jeff CairdDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW Calgary, Calgary, T4B 4B2, Canada.
Rick SawatzkySchool of Nursing, Trinity Western University, Langley, BC, Canada.
Bryan HarDepartment of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
William A GhaliLibin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Colleen M NorrisFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Michelle M GrahamFaculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Matthew T JamesDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Stephen B WiltonLibin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Tolulope T SajobiLibin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. ttsajobi@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5696-5552
APPROACH investigators

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research SPOR Catalyst Grant 424901Canadian Institutes of Health Research SPOR Multiyear Innovative Trials Grant Canadian Institutes of Health Research SPOR Multiyear Innovative Trials GrantLibin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronary artery disease (CAD) confers increased risks of premature mortality, non-fatal morbidity, and significant impairment in functional status and health-related quality of life. Routine administration of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and its real time delivery to care providers is known to have the potential to inform routine cardiac care and to improve quality of care and patient outcomes. This study describes a user-centered development and evaluation of the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment (APPROACH) electronic Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement (e-PROM) system. This e-PROM system is an electronic system for the administration of PROMs to patients with CAD and the delivery of the summarized information to their care providers to facilitate patient-physician communication and shared decision-making. This electronic platform was designed to be accessible via web-based and hand-held devices. Heuristic and user acceptance evaluation were conducted with patients and attending care providers.

resultsThe APPROACH e-PROM system was co-developed with patients and care providers, research investigators, informaticians and information technology experts. Five PROMs were selected for inclusion in the online platform after consultations with patient partners, care providers, and PROMs experts: the Seattle Angina Questionnaire, Patient Health Questionnaire, EuroQOL, and Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey, and Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory. The heuristic evaluation was completed by four design experts who examined the usability of the prototype interfaces. User acceptance testing was completed with 13 patients and 10 cardiologists who evaluated prototype user interfaces of the e-PROM system.

conclusionBoth patients and physicians found the APPROACH e-PROM system to be easy to use, understandable, and acceptable. The APPROACH e-PROM system provides a user-informed electronic platform designed to incorporate PROMs into the delivery of individualized cardiac care for persons with CAD.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseasePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAgedAlbertaFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsQuality of LifeUser-Centered DesignCoronary artery diseaseElectronic patient-reported outcomesHeuristic evaluationPatient engagementUsability evaluation

Identifiers

PMID39196484
PMCPMC11358368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.