ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2024
The impact of spinal anesthesia on cardiac function in euvolemic vascular surgery patients: insights from echocardiography and biomarkers.
Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure response to spinal anaesthesia in euvolaemic vascular surgery patients.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Existing evidence of the effect of spinal anesthesia (SA) on cardiac systolic function is scarce and inconclusive. This study aimed to evaluate the effects induced by a single injection of SA for elective vascular surgery on left (LV) and right (RV) ventricular systolic performance using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). A prospective study. Single-center study, university hospital. Adult patients undergoing elective vascular surgery with SA. During patients' evaluations fluid administration was targeted using arterial waveform monitoring. All patients underwent TTE studies before and after SA induction for the assessment of indices reflective of LV and RV systolic function. Blood samples were drawn to measure troponin and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. A total of 62 patients (88.7% males, 71.00 ± 9.42 years) were included in the study. The primary outcome was the difference before and after SA in LV ejection fraction (LVEF) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE). In total population, LVEF significantly increased after SA 53.07% [16.51]vs 53.86% [13.28]; p < 0.001). End-systolic volume (ESV, 69.50 [51.50] vs. 65.00 [29.50] ml; p < 0.001) decreased while stroke volume (SV) insignificantly increased (70.51 ± 16.70 vs. 73.00 ± 18.76 ml; p = 0.131) during SA. TAPSE remained unchanged (2.23 [0.56] vs. 2.25 [0.69] mm; p = 0.558). In patients with impaired compared to those with preserved LV systolic function, the changes evidenced in LVEF (7.49 ± 4.15 vs. 0.59 ± 2.79; p < 0.001), ESV (-18.13 ± 18.20 vs-1.53 ± 9.09; p < 0.001) and SV (8.71 ± 11.96 vs-1.43 ± 11.89; p = 0.002) were greater. This study provides evidence that SA in patients undergoing elective vascular surgery improved LV systolic function, while changes in RV systolic function are minimal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39196451What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.