Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39196384›Full record

ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2024

Norms for 718 Persian Words in Emotional Dimensions, Animacy, and Familiarity.

Firouzeh Mahjoubnavaz, Setareh Mokhtari, Reza Khosrowabadi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Firouzeh MahjoubnavazInstitute for Cognitive and Brain Sciences (ICBS), Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Setareh MokhtariInstitute for Cognitive and Brain Sciences (ICBS), Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Reza KhosrowabadiInstitute for Cognitive and Brain Sciences (ICBS), Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. r_khosroabadi@sbu.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6282-9389

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research frequently uses words as stimuli to assess cognitive and psychological processes. However, various attributes of these words, such as their semantic and emotional aspects, could potentially confound study results if not properly controlled. This study aims to establish a reliable foundation for the semantic and emotional aspects of words for research in Persian. To this end, the present study provided norms for 718 Persian nouns in arousal, valence, familiarity, and animacy dimensions. The words were selected from a previous English dataset (Warriner et al. in Behav Res Methods 45(4):1191-1207, 2013), translated into Persian, and rated by a total of 463 native Persian-speaking participants. The ratings were obtained through an online questionnaire using a 9-point Likert scale for emotional dimensions (i.e., valence and arousal) and a 5-point Likert scale for semantic dimensions (i.e., familiarity and animacy). The reliability of the ratings was measured using the split-half method, and the result indicated a high consistency of ratings in all dimensions. To assess the relationship between the emotional and semantic dimensions, Pearson correlation coefficient was conducted. Gender differences were investigated through the Mann-Whitney U test, and significant differences were observed in all dimensions. These results are compared with findings from previous studies that were conducted in various languages.

Indexed as

EmotionsRecognition, PsychologySemanticsAdolescentAdultArousalFemaleHumansIranLanguageMalePsycholinguisticsReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultAffective normsAnimacyArousalEmotional valenceFamiliarityPersian

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.