Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39196383›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2024

[Psychedelic and dissociative agents in psychiatry: challenges in the treatment].

Johannes Jungwirth, Francesco Bavato, Boris B Quednow

Erratum issuedAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    2025
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Johannes JungwirthAG Neurophänomenologie des Bewusstseins, Erwachsenenpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Zürich, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Schweiz.
Francesco BavatoAG Experimentelle Pharmakopsychologie und psychologische Suchtforschung, Erwachsenenpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Zürich, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Schweiz.
Boris B QuednowAG Experimentelle Pharmakopsychologie und psychologische Suchtforschung, Erwachsenenpsychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Zürich, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Schweiz. quednow@bli.uzh.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the discovery of the antidepressive effects of ketamine and the increasing withdrawal of the pharmaceutical industry from the development of new psychotropic drugs, the psychiatric research into the clinical application of hallucinogens in psychiatry has literally blossomed in the last two decades. Promising results for various treatment approaches with psychedelic agents, such lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and psilocybin, and dissociative agents, such as ketamine and esketamine, have raised great hopes among researchers, clinicians and patients in recent years, so that there was already talk of a new era in psychiatry. As one of the first of these substances, in December 2019 intranasal esketamine was approved in the USA and the EU for the treatment of treatment-resistant depression and Switzerland followed in 2020. Recently, psilocybin was approved in Australia, Canada and Switzerland for compassionate use in exceptional cases for the treatment of depression, while large approval studies with various psychedelic agents are currently ongoing worldwide. The medical application of psychedelic agents and ketamine/esketamine is considered to be safe; however, as with all new forms of treatment it is of crucial importance that, in addition to the hopes, the specific challenges of these new treatment approaches must also be carefully considered and assessed. Excessive expectations and an insufficient risk-benefit estimation are detrimental to the patients and the reputation of the treating physician. Although a possible paradigm shift in the care of mental health is already being discussed, this review article consciously concentrates on the possible risks of treatment and the methodological weaknesses of the studies carried out so far.

Indexed as

HallucinogensHumansKetamineLysergic Acid DiethylamideMental DisordersPsilocybinPsychiatryTreatment OutcomeEsketamineHallucinogensKetamineLysergic Acid DiethylamidePsilocybinAddictive potentialKetamineSide effectsStudy qualityTreatment risks

Identifiers

PMID39196383
PMCPMC11374839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.