ReviewArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2024
COVID-19 vaccinations pre- and antepartum: a consideration of the evidence and discussion of issues.
Review in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe COVID-19 vaccine should be universally offered to pregnant women and women planning pregnancies. This is on the basis that COVID-19 infection can complicate the pregnancy and have adverse health implications in pregnancy, as compared to non-pregnant women, which the vaccine helps to mitigate. This is the recommendation of many governing bodies in medical care. However, certain issues require consideration, which are not discussed in the current guidelines. These include the induction of fever by the vaccines and the role fever can play in teratogenicity, the induction of hyper-coagulable and thrombocytopenic states by the vaccines and other known contraindications to the vaccines. In this article, we develop strategies to minimize risks in these situations. We also discuss the theoretical advantage of calling for a booster COVID-19 vaccinate in all pregnant women in the late second or early third trimester, even if previously immunized, and encourage further research, to investigate the possible benefits of this proposed intervention. This article acts as an educational supplement to help clinicians manage pregnant women and addresses many issues, not discussed in most COVID-19 vaccine recommendations by international societies related to pregnant women.
methodsThis article is a literature review of the current, limited data. The information extrapolated allowed for suggestions regarding COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. RESULTS AND
conclusionsThe study discusses hypothetical issues, to minimize any risks associated with COVID-19, and serves as a compilation of data to further the current literature, in proving that COVID-19 vaccines have minimal risks in pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39196328What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.