ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2024
Effect of snoring on pregnant women and fetal outcomes: a cross sectional study.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health Sciences Students' Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Snoring: A Cross-Sectional Study in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.Nature and science of sleep · 2026Article
- Prenatal maternal sleep and maternal-infant attachment: a systematic review.Frontiers in sleep · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSnoring frequently occurs among pregnant women, particularly in the later stages of pregnancy. It often signals obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), which could potentially affect pregnancy outcomes negatively. Hence, our study aimed to investigate how snoring influences the likelihood of pregnancy complications and fetal outcomes in a cohort of expectant mothers.
methodsWe enrolled pregnant women in their second and third trimesters and had them fill out a questionnaire concerning sleep-related symptoms such as snoring, excessive daytime sleepiness, and frequency of nighttime awakenings, along with anthropometric measurements. Subsequently, the participants were divided into snorers and non-snorers, and the occurrence of pregnancy complications and fetal outcomes was monitored.
resultsThe study enrolled a total of 212 pregnant women, among whom 35 were identified as snorers and 177 as non-snorers during mid to late pregnancy. This indicated a snoring prevalence of 16.5% in our sample. Significant differences were noted between the two groups regarding the occurrence of oligohydramnios (11.43% vs. 2.82%, p = 0.044) and fetal distress (28.57% vs. 8.47%, p = 0.003). Logistic regression analyses revealed that snoring was independently associated with fetal distress (odds ratio [OR] = 4.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.88-13.23, p = 0.001).
conclusionsOur findings suggest that habitual snoring was the independent risk factor fetal distress after adjusting for potential confounders, indicating that habitual snoring may have a detrimental effect during mid to late pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39196317What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.