Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39196215›Full record

ReviewNature cardiovascular research2024

Stem cell models of inherited arrhythmias.

Tammy Ryan, Jason D Roberts

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature cardiovascular research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Cardiac arrhythmias and genetics - current stage.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tammy RyanMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. tammy.ryan@medportal.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-0428-8932
Jason D RobertsMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inherited arrhythmias are a heterogeneous group of conditions that confer risk of sudden death. Many inherited arrhythmias have been linked to pathogenic genetic variants that result in ion channel dysfunction, although current genetic testing panels fail to identify variants in many patients, potentially secondary to their underlying substrates being oligogenic or polygenic. Here we review the current state of knowledge surrounding the cellular mechanisms of inherited arrhythmias generated from stem cell models with a focus on integrating genetic and mechanistic data. The utility and limitations of human induced pluripotent stem cell models in disease modeling and drug development are also explored with a particular focus on examples of pharmacogenetics and precision medicine. We submit that progress in understanding inherited arrhythmias is likely to be made by using human induced pluripotent stem cells to model probable polygenic cases as well as to interrogate the diverse and potentially complex molecular networks implicated by genome-wide association studies.

Indexed as

Arrhythmias, CardiacGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsAction PotentialsAnimalsAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsGenome-Wide Association StudyHeredityHumansMultifactorial InheritanceMyocytes, CardiacPhenotypePrecision MedicineRisk FactorsAnti-Arrhythmia Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.