Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39196070›Full record

ArticleClinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis

Comparison of Three Different Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) Criteria and Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Antithrombin Investigation in Patients with Confirmed Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy (SIC).

Qing Wei, Mengyao Wang, Xiaying Peng, Jingrong Yang, Ting Niu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qing WeiDepartment of Hematology, The Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0002-7263-4080
Mengyao WangDepartment of Hematology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xiaying PengDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Jingrong YangDepartment of Hematology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ting NiuDepartment of Hematology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A new scoring system termed sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) has been proposed to diagnose early sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). This study performed DIC-related analyses in patients with confirmed SIC. Data from the intensive care unit (ICU) departments of the three hospitals between 2020 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Finally, 125 patients with confirmed SIC were enrolled in the study. The diagnostic value of three widely used DIC criteria was assessed in patients with newly diagnosed SIC. In addition, the diagnostic and prognostic value of antithrombin (AT) was analyzed in patients with SIC. The Japanese Association for Acute Medicine DIC criteria (JAAM) exhibited the highest DIC diagnostic rate, while the mortality risk of SIC patients demonstrated a proportional increase with higher International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) and Chinese DIC scoring system (CDSS) scores. Low AT activity (<70%) in septic patients upon SIC diagnosis predicted a very high 28-day mortality rate, almost twice as high as in the normal AT activity (≥70%) group. A decreasing tendency in AT activity after clinical interventions was correlated with increased mortality. The area under the ROC curve (AU-ROC) of AT in DIC diagnosis was statistically significant when CDSS and ISTH were used as diagnostic criteria, but not JAAM. Each of the three DIC diagnostic criteria showed diagnostic and prognostic advantages for SIC. AT could be an independent prognostic indicator for SIC but demonstrated a relatively limited DIC diagnostic value. Adding AT to the SIC scoring system may increase its prognostic power.

Indexed as

AntithrombinsDisseminated Intravascular CoagulationSepsisAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAntithrombinsantithrombin (AT)disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC)the Chinese DIC scoring system (CDSS)the international society of thrombosis and hemostasis for overt DIC criteria (ISTH)the Japanese association for acute medicine DIC criteria (AAM)

Identifiers

PMID39196070
PMCPMC11363244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.