Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39195874›Full record

ReviewNature cardiovascular research2022

Chasing LDL cholesterol to the bottom - PCSK9 in perspective.

Peter Libby, Lale Tokgözoğlu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature cardiovascular research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. The long non-coding RNAFrontiers in nutrition · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Oral PCSK9 Inhibitors: Will They Work?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter LibbyDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. plibby@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1502-502X
Lale TokgözoğluDepartment of Cardiology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

American Heart Association (American Heart Association, Inc.) 18CSA34080399Fondation Leducq N/AU.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) RO1HL134892 and RO1HL163099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) indubitably contributes causally to atherosclerosis, a leading challenge to health worldwide. Interventions that lower LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) have made remarkable inroads against this global scourge. Recent therapeutic advances have achieved ever lower levels of LDL-C. Improved cardiovascular outcomes continue to accrue from these interventions. In particular, the discovery of the role of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) as the causal gene in autosomal-dominant hypercholesterolemia has led with remarkable speed to the development of novel agents to lower LDL-C concentrations beyond prior measures, and to alleviate further cardiovascular risk. We review how this story, and its position in the broader landscape of therapy to prevent atherosclerotic events, represents a notable victory of contemporary cardiovascular medicine and reflects successful partnerships between basic scientists, the pharmaceutical and biotechnology sectors, and clinical investigators. Continued cooperation in this manner promises to yield further progress in combating cardiovascular diseases beyond interventions on LDL-C.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.