Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39195728›Full record

ReviewTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2024

Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches in Lifespan Brain Age Prediction: A Comprehensive Review.

Yutong Wu, Hongjian Gao, Chen Zhang, Xiangge Ma, Xinyu Zhu, Shuicai Wu, Lan Lin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. [Research progress in electroencephalogram-based brain age prediction].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yutong WuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.ORCID 0009-0003-1433-8520
Hongjian GaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9902-893X
Chen ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Xiangge MaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.ORCID 0009-0003-1403-9491
Xinyu ZhuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Shuicai WuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Lan LinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Chemistry and Life Science, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3431-2753

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81971683
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of 'brain age', derived from neuroimaging data, serves as a crucial biomarker reflecting cognitive vitality and neurodegenerative trajectories. In the past decade, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) integration has transformed the field, providing advanced models for brain age estimation. However, achieving precise brain age prediction across all ages remains a significant analytical challenge. This comprehensive review scrutinizes advancements in ML- and DL-based brain age prediction, analyzing 52 peer-reviewed studies from 2020 to 2024. It assesses various model architectures, highlighting their effectiveness and nuances in lifespan brain age studies. By comparing ML and DL, strengths in forecasting and methodological limitations are revealed. Finally, key findings from the reviewed articles are summarized and a number of major issues related to ML/DL-based lifespan brain age prediction are discussed. Through this study, we aim at the synthesis of the current state of brain age prediction, emphasizing both advancements and persistent challenges, guiding future research, technological advancements, and improving early intervention strategies for neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

AgingBrainDeep LearningMachine LearningAgedHumansLongevityNeuroimagingbrain age predictiondeep learninglifespan brain agemachine learningneuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID39195728
PMCPMC11359833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.