Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39195726›Full record

ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2024

Novel Deep CNNs Explore Regions, Boundaries, and Residual Learning for COVID-19 Infection Analysis in Lung CT.

Bader Khalid Alshemaimri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bader Khalid AlshemaimriSoftware Engineering Department, College of Computing and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0004-8865-5438

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 poses a global health crisis, necessitating precise diagnostic methods for timely containment. However, accurately delineating COVID-19-affected regions in lung CT scans is challenging due to contrast variations and significant texture diversity. In this regard, this study introduces a novel two-stage classification and segmentation CNN approach for COVID-19 lung radiological pattern analysis. A novel Residual-BRNet is developed to integrate boundary and regional operations with residual learning, capturing key COVID-19 radiological homogeneous regions, texture variations, and structural contrast patterns in the classification stage. Subsequently, infectious CT images undergo lesion segmentation using the newly proposed RESeg segmentation CNN in the second stage. The RESeg leverages both average and max-pooling implementations to simultaneously learn region homogeneity and boundary-related patterns. Furthermore, novel pixel attention (PA) blocks are integrated into RESeg to effectively address mildly COVID-19-infected regions. The evaluation of the proposed Residual-BRNet CNN in the classification stage demonstrates promising performance metrics, achieving an accuracy of 97.97%, F1-score of 98.01%, sensitivity of 98.42%, and MCC of 96.81%. Meanwhile, PA-RESeg in the segmentation phase achieves an optimal segmentation performance with an IoU score of 98.43% and a dice similarity score of 95.96% of the lesion region. The framework's effectiveness in detecting and segmenting COVID-19 lesions highlights its potential for clinical applications.

Indexed as

COVID-19LungSARS-CoV-2Tomography, X-Ray ComputedDeep LearningHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedboundaryclassificationCNNCOVID-19CT scanregionresidualsegmentationtransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID39195726
PMCPMC11359787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.