ArticleToxics2024
Electrokinetic Remediation of Cu- and Zn-Contaminated Soft Clay with Electrolytes Situated above Soil Surfaces.
Article in Toxics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Citric Acid-Assisted Electrokinetic Remediation of Arsenic and Metal-Rich Acidic Mine Pond Sediments.Toxics · 2025Article
- Advancements in Biochar Research Methods for Soil Pollution Remediation: Development and Applications.ACS omega · 2025Review
- Effect of Electrode Positioning on Electrokinetic Remediation of Contaminated Soft Clay with Surface Electrolyte.Toxics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electrokinetic remediation (EKR) has shown great potential for the remediation of in situ contaminated soils. For heavy metal-contaminated soft clay with high moisture content and low permeability, an electrokinetic remediation method with electrolytes placed above the ground surface is used to avoid issues such as electrolyte leakage and secondary contamination that may arise from directly injecting electrolytes into the soil. In this context, using this novel experimental device, a set of citric acid (CA)-enhanced EKR tests were conducted to investigate the optimal design parameters for Cu- and Zn-contaminated soft clay. The average removal rates of heavy metals Cu and Zn in these tests were in the range of 27.9-85.5% and 63.9-83.5%, respectively. The results indicate that the Zn removal was efficient. This was determined by the migration intensity of the electro-osmotic flow, particularly the volume reduction of the anolyte. The main factors affecting the Cu removal efficiency in sequence were the effective electric potential of the contaminated soft clay and the electrolyte concentration. Designing experimental parameters based on these parameters will help remove Cu and Zn. Moreover, the shear strength of the contaminated soil was improved; however, the degree of improvement was limited. Low-concentration CA can effectively control the contact resistance between the anode and soil, the contact resistance between the cathode and soil, and the soil resistance by increasing the amount of electrolyte and the contact area between the electrolyte and soil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.