ArticleMetabolites2024
Alterations in Choline Metabolism in Non-Obese Individuals with Insulin Resistance and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Article in Metabolites, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Metabolomic Pathways Distinguishing Metabolically Healthy and Unhealthy Obesity from Normal-Weight: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Triglyceride-glucose index, plasma metabolome and aortic stenosis: a Mendelian randomization analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Dysregulation of phosphatidylethanolamine metabolism associated with upregulation of PNPLA6 in high-fat diet/streptozotocin mice.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Predictive Utility and Metabolomic Signatures of TG/HDL-C Ratio for Metabolic Syndrome Without Cardiovascular Disease and/or Diabetes in Qatari Adults.Metabolites · 2025Article
- Article
- Metabolic signatures of combined exercise and fasting: an expanded perspective on previous telomere length findings.Frontiers in aging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The prevalence of non-obese individuals with insulin resistance (IR) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) is increasing worldwide. This study investigates the metabolic signature of phospholipid-associated metabolites in non-obese individuals with IR and T2D, aiming to identify potential biomarkers for these metabolic disorders. The study cohort included non-obese individuals from the Qatar Biobank categorized into three groups: insulin sensitive, insulin resistant, and patients with T2D. Each group comprised 236 participants, totaling 708 individuals. Metabolomic profiling was conducted using high-resolution mass spectrometry, and statistical analyses were performed to identify metabolites associated with the progression from IS to IR and T2D. The study observed significant alterations in specific phospholipid metabolites across the IS, IR, and T2D groups. Choline phosphate, glycerophosphoethanolamine, choline, glycerophosphorylcholine (GPC), and trimethylamine N-oxide showed significant changes correlated with disease progression. A distinct metabolic signature in non-obese individuals with IR and T2D was characterized by shifts in choline metabolism, including decreased levels of choline and trimethylamine N-oxide and increased levels of phosphatidylcholines, phosphatidylethanolamines, and their degradation products. These findings suggest that alterations in choline metabolism may play a critical role in the development of glucose intolerance and insulin resistance. Targeting choline metabolism could offer potential therapeutic strategies for treating T2D. Further research is needed to validate these biomarkers and understand their functional significance in the pathogenesis of IR and T2D in non-obese populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.