Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39195337›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2024

Appropriateness of Imaging for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer-Real World Data from the Pennsylvania Urologic Regional Collaboration (PURC).

Raidizon Mercedes, Dennis Head, Elizabeth Zook, Eric Eidelman, Jeffrey Tomaszewski, Serge Ginzburg, Robert Uzzo, Marc Smaldone, John Danella, Thomas J Guzzo and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Raidizon MercedesDepartment of Urology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Dennis HeadDepartment of Urology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-2796-1497
Elizabeth ZookDepartment of Urology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Eric EidelmanDepartment of Urology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Jeffrey TomaszewskiDepartment of Urology, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, NJ 08103, USA.
Serge GinzburgDepartment of Urology, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, PA 19141, USA.
Robert UzzoDepartment of Urology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
Marc SmaldoneDepartment of Urology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
John DanellaDepartment of Urology, Geisinger Health, Danville, PA 17822, USA.
Thomas J GuzzoDepartment of Urology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Daniel LeeDepartment of Urology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Laurence BelkoffMidLantic Urology, Bala Cynwyd, PA 19008, USA.
Jeffrey WalkerMidLantic Urology, Bala Cynwyd, PA 19008, USA.
Adam ReeseDepartment of Urology, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Mihir S ShahDepartment of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2097-8888
Bruce JacobsDepartment of Urology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15219, USA.
Jay D RamanDepartment of Urology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging for prostate cancer defines the extent of disease. Guidelines recommend against imaging low-risk prostate cancer patients with a computed tomography (CT) scan or bone scan due to the low probability of metastasis. We reviewed imaging performed for men diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer across the Pennsylvania Urologic Regional Collaborative (PURC), a physician-led data sharing and quality improvement collaborative. The data of 10 practices were queried regarding the imaging performed in men diagnosed with prostate cancer from 2015 to 2022. The cohort included 13,122 patients with 3502 (27%) low-risk, 2364 (18%) favorable intermediate-risk, 3585 (27%) unfavorable intermediate-risk, and 3671 (28%) high-risk prostate cancer, based on the AUA guidelines. Amongst the low-risk patients, imaging utilization included pelvic MRI (59.7%), bone scan (17.8%), CT (16.0%), and PET-based imaging (0.5%). Redundant imaging occurred in 1022 patients (29.2%). There was variability among the PURC sites for imaging used in the low-risk patients, and iterative education reduced the need for CT and bone scans. Approximately 15% of low-risk patients had staging imaging performed using either a CT or bone scan, and redundant imaging occurred in almost one-third of men. Such data underscore the need for continued guideline-based education to optimize the stewardship of resources and reduce unnecessary costs to the healthcare system.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsAgedDiagnostic ImagingHumansMaleMiddle AgedPennsylvaniaTomography, X-Ray ComputedCTMRIover-imagingPETredundantrisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID39195337
PMCPMC11352630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.