Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39195207›Full record

ArticleCells2024

Tissue- and Temporal-Dependent Dynamics of Myeloablation in Response to Gemcitabine Chemotherapy.

Lydia E Kitelinger, Eric A Thim, Sarah Y Zipkowitz, Richard J Price, Timothy N J Bullock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lydia E KitelingerDepartment of Pathology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9167-1285
Eric A ThimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Sarah Y ZipkowitzDepartment of Pathology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1005-331X
Richard J PriceDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.
Timothy N J BullockDepartment of Pathology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6141-3261

Funding

Women's Oncology Program - WONP30CA044579 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Dina Gould Halme · 1987 to 2026
$72.1M
INTERDISCIPLINARY TRAINING PROGRAM IN IMMUNOLOGYT32AI007496 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Michael G. Brown, Coleen A McNamara · 1995 to 2026
$10.2M
Focused Ultrasound Regimens that Synergize with Melanoma ImmunotherapyR01EB030007 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI BULLOCK, TIMOTHY N, PRICE, RICHARD J. · 2020 to 2023
$2.6M
Ceramide Nanoliposomes in Combination with Focused Ultrasound for Treating Breast CancerR21CA230088 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI KESTER, MARK, PRICE, RICHARD J. · 2018 to 2019
$355k
Focused Ultrasound Foundation Targeting immunosuppressive myeloid cells to increase efficacy of thermally ablative FUS in breast cancerNCI NIH HHS P30 CA044579NCI NIH HHS R21 CA230088NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007496NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB030007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), the most aggressive subset of breast cancer, immune cell infiltrates have prognostic implications. The presence of myeloid-derived suppressor cells supports tumor progression, while tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) correlate with improved survival and responsiveness to immunotherapy. Manipulating the abundance of these populations may enhance tumor immunity. Gemcitabine (GEM), a clinically employed chemotherapeutic, is reported to be systemically myeloablative, and thus it is a potentially useful adjunct therapy for promoting anti-tumor immunity. However, knowledge about the immunological effects of GEM intratumorally is limited. Thus, we directly compared the impact of systemic GEM on immune cell presence and functionality in the tumor microenvironment (TME) to its effects in the periphery. We found that GEM is not myeloablative in the TME; rather, we observed sustained, significant reductions in TILs and dendritic cells-crucial components in initiating an adaptive immune response. We also performed bulk-RNA sequencing to identify immunological alterations transcriptionally induced by GEM. While we found evidence of upregulation in the interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) response pathway, we determined that GEM-mediated growth control is not dependent on IFN-γ. Overall, our findings yield new insights into the tissue- and temporal-dependent immune ablative effects of GEM, contrasting the paradigm that this therapy is specifically myeloablative.

Indexed as

DeoxycytidineGemcitabineLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingTumor MicroenvironmentAnimalsCell Line, TumorDendritic CellsFemaleHumansInterferon-gammaMiceTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsDeoxycytidineGemcitabineInterferon-gammachemotherapygemcitabinetriple-negative breast cancertumor immunologytumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID39195207
PMCPMC11352862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.